This paper constructs a new data set of repeated sales of artworks and estimates an annual index of art prices for the period 1875-2000. Contrary to earlier studies, we find art outperforms fixed income securities as an investment, though it significantly under-performs stocks in the US. Art is also found to have lower volatility and lower correlation with other assets, making it more attractive for portfolio diversification than discovered in earlier research. There is strong evidence of underperformance of masterpieces, meaning expensive paintings tend to underperform the art market index. A further study reveals that the underperformance could be consistent with overbidding at auctions. The evidence is mixed on whether the "law of one price" holds in the New York auction market.(JEL G14, Z10) 1 Department of Finance and Department of Operations Management, Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012-1126. We have benefited from helpful discussions with Will Goetzmann, Robert Solow and Larry White on art as an investment. We are grateful to Jennifer Bowe, Jin Hung and Loan Hong for able research assistance. We would also like to thank Mathew Gee of the Stern Computer Department for his tireless efforts in rationalizing our database. We also wish to thank John Ammer, John Campbell, Victor Ginsburgh, Robert Hodrick, Burton Malkiel, Tom Pugel and seminar participants at Temple University and University of Southern California for helpful comments and John Campbell for his latent variable model algorithm. All errors are ours.© Jianping Mei and Michael Moses.9/24/01 1 Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces AbstractThis paper constructs a new data set of repeated sales of artworks and estimates an annual

Recent evidence suggests that the variation in the expected excess returns is predictable and arises from changes in business conditions. Using a multifactor latent variable model with time-varying risk premiums, we decompose excess returns into expected and unexpected excess returns to examine what determines movements in expected excess returns for equity REITs are more predictable than all other assets examined, due in part to cap rates which contain useful information about the general risk condition in the economy. We also find that the conditional risk premiums (expected excess returns) on EREITs move very closely with those of small cap stocks and much less with those of bonds.Recent evidence suggests that the variation in the expected excess returns over time is predictable and is the result of changes in business conditions. 1 We offer further evidence on this issue by extending the previous literature to include real estate, particularly equity real estate investment trusts (EREITs). 2 What is unique about EREITs is that it is traded as a stock on a stock exchange but represents an underlying ownership in a portfolio of real estate. This feature raises the possibility that different variables may be required to capture the time variation in its risk premiums relative to those for bond and non-REIT stocks. Another issue related to the hybrid nature of EREITs is whether EREITs are a hybrid of stocks and bonds and whether the stock component is representative of large cap stocks or small cap stocks. More specifically, the questions addressed in this article include: (1) Do the same variables forecast stocks, bonds, and real estate returns so that the expected returns (conditional risk premiums) on these assets move together? In particular, do cap rates carry information about the conditional risk premium for equity REITs but no other asset class? (2) Is the variation in the expected returns on equity REITs related to business conditions? (3) To what extent do REITs resemble stocks with large capitalizations, stocks with small capitalizations, and bonds?While Mengden and Hartzell (1986), Giliberto (1990), and Corgel and Rogers (1991), among others, have studied the hybrid nature of REITs in the past, none of these studies

This article develops a new framework for measuring financial and real economic linkages between countries. Using United States and United Kingdom data from 1957 to 1989, we find closer financial linkages after the Bretton Woods currency arrangement was abandoned and Britain suspended exchange controls. In a pairwise application to fifteen countries over a shorter period, we also find that news about future dividend growth is more highly correlated between countries than contemporaneous output measures. This suggests that there are lags in the international transmission of economic shocks and that contemporaneous output correlation may understate the magnitude of integration.

The market dynamics of technology stocks in the late 1990s have stimulated a growing body of theory that analyzes the joint effects of short-sales constraints and heterogeneous beliefs on stock prices and trading volume. This paper examines several implications of these theories using a unique data sample from a market with stringent short-sales constraints and perfectly segmented dual-class shares. The identical rights of the dual-class shares allow us to control for stock fundamentals. We find that trading caused by investors' speculative motives can help explain a significant fraction of the price difference between the dual-class shares.

No abstract