BackgroundN6-methylation (m6A) modification of RNA has been found to have essential effects on aspects of the tumor microenvironment (TME) including hypoxia status and mobilization of immune cells. However, there are no studies to explore the combined effect of m6A modification and hypoxia on molecular heterogeneity and TME of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).MethodsWe collected The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-TNBC, N=139), the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC-TNBC, N=297), the GSE103091, GSE21653, and GSE135565 series from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO-TNBC, N=247), and FUSCCTNBC (N=245) for our study. The non-negative matrix factorization algorithm was used to cluster TNBC samples. Immune cell infiltration was analyzed by the CIBERSORT algorithm. The enrichment scores were calculated by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis(ssGSEA) to characterize TME in TNBC samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR were performed to detect the gene expression.ResultsBased on the expression of m6A-related genes, we identified three distinct m6A clusters (denoted A, B, and C) in TNBC samples. Comparing the TME characteristics among the three clusters, we observed that cluster C was strongly related to hypoxia status and immune suppression, whereas clusters A and B displayed more immune cell infiltration. Therefore, we combine m6A and hypoxia related genes to classify two m6A-hypoxia clusters of TNBC and screened six prognostic genes by LASSO-Cox regression to construct a m6A-hypoxia signature(MHPS), which divided TNBC samples into high- and low-risk groups. We identified different TME features, immune cell infiltration between the two groups, and a better immunotherapy response was observed in the low-risk group. A nomogram was constructed with tumor size, lymph node, and risk score to improve clinical application of MHPS.ConclusionWe identified distinct TME characteristics of TNBC based on three different m6A modification patterns. Then, we constructed a specific m6A–hypoxia signature for TNBC to evaluate risk and predict immunotherapy response of patients, to enable more accurate treatment in the future.

Background The correlations between circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-derived genomic markers and treatment response and survival outcome in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) have not been extensively characterized. Methods Blood samples from 141 ABC patients who underwent first-line standard treatment in Peking University Cancer Hospital were collected. A next-generation sequencing based liquid biopsy assay (PredicineCARE) was used to detect somatic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) in ctDNA. A subset of matched blood samples and tumour tissue biopsies were compared to evaluate the concordance. Results Overall, TP53 (44.0%) and PIK3CA (28.4%) were the top two altered genes. Frequent CNVs included amplifications of ERBB2 (24.8%) and FGFR1 (8.5%) and deletions of CDKN2A (3.5%). PIK3CA/TP53 and FGFR1/2/3 variants were associated with drug resistance in hormone receptor-positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2 +) patients. The comparison of genomic variants across matched tumour tissue and ctDNA samples revealed a moderate to high concordance that was gene dependent. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients harbouring TP53 or PIK3CA alterations had a shorter overall survival than those without corresponding mutations (P = 0.03 and 0.008). A high ctDNA fraction was correlated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.005) in TNBC patients. High blood-based tumor mutation burden (bTMB) was associated with a shorter PFS for HER2 + and TNBC patients (P = 0.009 and 0.05). Moreover, disease monitoring revealed several acquired genomic variants such as ESR1 mutations, CDKN2A deletions, and FGFR1 amplifications. Conclusions This study revealed the molecular profiles of Chinese patients with ABC and the clinical validity of ctDNA-derived markers, including the ctDNA fraction and bTMB, for predicting treatment response, prognosis, and disease progression. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03792529. Registered January 3rd 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792529.

IntroductionPatients with breast cancer with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) such as germline BRCA1/2 mutations would respond to DNA-damaging drugs. Several clinical studies have revealed that HRD biomarkers were associated with the outcomes of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, no systematic review has determined the prognostic role of HRD biomarkers in patients with EBC. Therefore, this study will systematically combine and analyse the results of previous studies, to facilitate the clinical use of HRD detection in EBC.Methods and analysisWe will search five databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, OVID and Web of Science through December 2021, with no language restriction. Two reviewers will independently screen all records based on pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main outcomes include pathological complete response, disease-free survival and Ooerall survival. In addition, all studies included must contain the detection of HRD score, HRD status or HRD-related gene mutational status and protein expression. Data extraction will be carried out by two reviewers independently according to a self-designed template. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Jadad Scale will be used for quality assessment for cohort studies and randomised clinical trials, respectively. Review Manager V.5.3.5 will be used to perform meta-analysis. Both the Q test and I2 statistic will be used to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted if significant heterogeneity appears and cannot be reduced by using a random-effect model.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for a systematic review. The results will be disseminated through international and national conferences or peer-reviewed publications.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021286522.

Background To compare the clinical value of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) and pegylated rhG-CSF(PEG-rhG-CSF) in early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, compare the efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF with different dose and explore the timing of rhG-CSF rescue treatment. Methods Patients in two PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups were given 3 mg or 6 mg PEG-rhG-CSF within 24 ~ 48 h after chemotherapy for preventing myelosuppression, while patients in the rhG-CSF group were given rhG-CSF. Observation indicators include the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and grade 3/4 chemotherapy-induced-neutropenia (CIN), the overall levels and nadir values of white blood cells (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), comparison of WBC and ANC curves over time, the incidence of CIN-related complications, the incidence of adverse events in each group and the timing of rescue treatment for rhG-CSF. Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN in the first cycle among the groups (P = 0.203). But the incidence of ≥ 3 grade CIN in two PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups was significantly lower than that in the rhG-CSF group (P < 0.001). The overall WBC and ANC levels in the PEG-rhG-CSF group were significantly higher than those in the rhG-CSF group (P < 0.001). In terms of CIN-related complications, less chemotherapy delay rate (1.1 vs. 7.5%, P = 0.092), less dose reduction rate (6.9 vs. 7.5%, P = 1.000), less antibiotic use rate (3.4 vs. 17.5%, P = 0.011) and less proportion of rhG-CSF rescue therapy (24.1 vs. 85.0%, P < 0.001) in the PEG-rhG-CSF group, and there were no significant differences between PEG-rhG-CSF subgroups. In the incidence of adverse events among the groups, there were no statistical differences. All patients undergoing rhG-CSF rescue treatment were mainly 4 grade (63.6%) and 3 grade (25.5%) CIN, and 10.9% of patients with 1 ~ 2 grade CIN who had high infection risk or had been infected. Conclusion PEG-rhG-CSF has better efficacy and equal tolerance compared with rhG-CSF in preventing CIN in EBC patients receiving EC regimen. Moreover, a half-dose 3 mg PEG-rhG-CSF also had good efficacy. Last, patients with ≥ 3 grade CIN and others who have been assessed to be at high risk of infection or have co-infection should consider rhG-CSF or even antibiotic rescue treatment.

535 Background: Endocrine therapy has greatly improved the clinical outcomes of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, there was an unmet need to identify the potentially best regimen of initial adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, in this network meta-analysis, we synthesized the latest evidence to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety among different 5 years of regimens of initial adjuvant endocrine therapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE in January 2022. Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was severe adverse effects (SAEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out to indirectly compare all regimens and the SUCRA values were used to obtain rankings. Results: Eleven studies with 49,987 subjects were included. For DFS, exemestane (EXE) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.87-0.96), anastrozole (ANA) (0.94, 0.90-0.97), letrozole (LET) (0.93, 0.89-0.97), tamoxifen (TAM) followed by EXE (0.91, 0.87-0.96), and TAM followed by ANA (0.92, 0.87-0.98) were more favorable than TAM, with TAM followed by EXE ranking as the first of SUCRA. For OS, only TAM followed by ANA showed significant superiority than TAM (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.97) and ranked as the first of SUCRA. For SAEs, EXE (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.04-2.98), ANA (1.58, 1.03-2.43), and LET (1.63, 1.02-2.57) showed greater associations with bone fracture than TAM. However, no significant difference in the incidences of cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and cerebrovascular events was found among all comparisons. Conclusions: The sequential use of aromatase inhibitors may be the optimal treatment mode for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer patients. In addition, the three kinds of aromatase inhibitors achieved roughly equal efficacy, but caused different types of SAEs.