BackgroundTo assess the potential effects of telbivudine (LdT) and entecavir (ETV) on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), we performed a meta-analysis of the relevant data available on these agents to evaluate their effects on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during treatment.MethodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Cochrane Library, and WanFang databases were searched for relevant articles appearing in the literature up to July 1, 2015. A total of 6 studies (1960 CHB patients) with 1-year eGFR outcomes were retrieved and analyzed.ResultsGenerally, the results of the 6 studies analyzed showed that eGFR was improved after LdT treatment, but was decreased after ETV treatment. Using a fixed-effects approach, the change in eGFR was found to be significantly different between LdT and ETV treatment (Z = 3.64; P = 0.0003). Whereas the eGFR was slightly decreased with ETV compared with baseline (−1.45 mL/min/1.73 m2), the eGFR was improved with LdT (2.99 mL/min/1.73 m2) after 1 year of treatment. An overall test of effect in the meta-analysis showed that the eGFR in LdT-treated patients was significantly improved after 1-year of treatment (Z = 3.71; P = 0.0002).ConclusionThis meta-analysis has confirmed that LdT has a renal protective effect whereas ETV does not. However, whether the benefit on renal function outweighs the occurrence of resistance in specific clinical situations is not yet clear.
Our findings suggest that transient elastography is an effective measurement tool for diagnosing and monitoring the histologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis B during antiviral treatment and can help avoid multiple liver biopsies.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telbivudine (LdT) and tenofovir (TDF) for preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vertical transmission for HBV-positive pregnant women. Pregnant women (n = 145) from January 2013 to June 2017 were enrolled when they met inclusion criteria, which included HBV DNA ≥1.0 × 10 7 copies/mL and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Groups A (n = 58) and B (n = 51) were treated with LdT and TDF, respectively. Group C (n = 36) received no antiviral treatment. All infants were vaccinated with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and HBV vaccine. Vertical transmission of HBV was indicated by the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in infants 6 months and 12 months after birth. There is no difference of clinical characteristics of patients among the 3 groups. Serum HBV DNA levels of the 3 groups were similar at baseline (Group A vs. Group B vs. Group C, 7.88 ± 0.65 vs. 7.91 ± 0.75 vs. 7.69 ± 0.53 P = .25). In addition, the after anti-HBV treatment in Groups A and B were significantly decreased. Also, the serum HBV DNA levels in both Groups A and B were lower than that of Group C ( P < .01, both). The HBV infection rate in Group A treated with LdT was not different from Group B treated with TDF. The dynamic changes of serum ALT level were similar. ALT levels were similar among the 3 Groups ( P = .171), while there is statistically significant difference between A and C, and between B and C before delivery ( P < .01). For the infants, there were no significant differences among body weight, height, head circumference, or Apgar score. However, the HBsAg positivity rates of infants in Groups A, B, C at postpartum 24 weeks and 48 weeks was 0%, 0%, and 11.1%, respectively ( P < .001). Administration of LdT or TDF to HBV-infected mothers are effective and safe to block mother-to-infant HBV transmission.
Background and aim: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) monotherapy (IFN group) and combination therapy with tenofovir (TDF) and Peg-IFN (IFN+TDF group) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Patients and methods: Data of 143 CHB patients were analyzed in this study. All patients enrolled received liver biopsy. Virologic responses were defined as hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <100 IU/mL, biochemical responses were defined as normalization of alanine aminotransferse (ALT) levels, and HBeAg serological response was defined as HBeAg loss or HBeAg seroconversion to HBeAb. HBsAg serological response was defined as HBsAg loss or HBsAg seroconversion to HBsAb. Results: We observed that a total of 16.7% (11/66) and 33.8% (26/77) patients in IFN and IFN+TDF group achieved complete viral suppression after 48 weeks treatment ( P =0.02). Although HBeAg levels in CHB patients in the IFN+TDF group decreased more rapidly during the 48-week treatment, we did not observe significant differences in HBeAg serological loss or seroconversion rates between the two groups at 24 and 48 weeks. HBsAg loss was observed in 13.0% (10/77) of CHB patients in the IFN+TDF group at 48 weeks, compared with only 3% (2/66) patients in the IFN group ( P =0.032). No significant difference was observed in HBsAg seroconversion rate between the two groups during 48-week treatment. The biochemical response rate was also significantly higher in the IFN+TDF group than that in the IFN group at week 48 ( P =0.015). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that IFN+TDF treatment (OR=4.41, P =0.003), severe baseline hepatic inflammation (OR=4.16, P <0.001), and lower baseline serum HBV DNA levels (OR=0.98, P =0.03) were strong predictors for the virological response. Younger age (OR=0.89, P =0.01), higher baseline ALT level (OR=1.01, P =0.038), and lower baseline HBeAg level (OR=0.99, P =0.008) were independent predictors for HBeAg sero-response after 48 weeks treatment. While only severe liver fibrosis (OR=1.69, P =0.028) and lower baseline HBsAg level (OR=0.22, P =0.005) were independent factors associated with HBsAg sero-response after 48 weeks treatment. Conclusion: Peg-IFN combined with TDF may increase the virological response rate, biochemical response rate, and HBsAg loss rate in patients with CHB infection. The combination treatment is more suitable for those patients who are likely to respond to the treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.