No abstract

Accurate prediction of sea surface emission is the key for sea surface salinity retrieval from satellite microwave radiometer. In order to retrieve salinity from satellite observation, several sea surface microwave emission models have been developed based on theoretical or empirical methods and validated by in-situ measurements in different regions. However, their performances are still unclear in the Chinese coastal waters. In this study, based on two cruises measurements in the East China Sea (ECS), including the brightness temperature measured by a shipborne microwave radiometer and other auxiliary data (sea surface salinity, sea surface temperature and wind speed), the performances of different sea surface emission models are tested. The results showed that the developed models provide fairly good accuracy in predicting brightness temperature; for example, the accuracy of small perturbance/small scale approximation model (SPM/SSA), two-scale model (TSM) and empirical model is in the range from 0.6 K to 3 K. Moreover, the TSM and empirical models are further improved by optimizing the model parameters in the ECS. Finally, the sea surface salinity were retrieved from shipborne measured data based on the improved models, and the results show that the root mean square (rms) differences between retrieved and in-situ sea surface salinity is about 0.4 psu, indicating the significant improvement by the regional model parameters.2 of 18 (ESTAR) and the scanning low-frequency microwave radiometer (SLFMR), successfully produced SSS maps in coastal areas in agreement with in-situ measurements with an accuracy of about 1 psu. Based on many experiments, the L-band is evidenced as the optimal frequency for remote sensing of SSS, which has been adopted by SMOS, Aquarius/SAC-D and SMAP. However, the sensitivity of satellite measured brightness temperature to SSS is quite low. For example, the sensitivity of vertically polarized brightness temperature to SSS variation is 0.4 to 0.8 K/psu for different observing angles and sea surface temperatures (SST), and it is only 0.2 to 0.6 K/psu for the horizontal polarization brightness temperature [10]. Thus, remote sensing of SSS requires a highly accurate retrieval model. It is widely accepted that the corrections of the sea surface and atmospheric effects are essential for remote sensing of SSS, since these effects could alter the value of sensor-measured brightness temperature and introduce errors into the SSS retrieval process. Besides the atmospheric effects, the increasing of sea surface emissivity due to the sea surface roughness and foam effects is the main source of error, which could significantly hamper the accuracy of SSS retrieval [11]. Over the past decades, the correction for sea surface roughness effects were studied based on the in-situ and airborne measurements; for example, the experiments made from a tower [12], wind and salinity experiments (WISE) [13,14], airborne Passive-Active L-band Sensor (PALS) campaign [15] and Combined Airborne Radio instruments for Ocean...

To better understand the hydrodynamic characteristics of Sansha Bay and how they are changed by the addition of a wharf, this study takes the design of the wharf on Changyao Island as an example. It uses the MIKE21 model to study the variation of tidal current velocity, tide direction and silt buildup before and after the construction of the wharf. The research results show that:1. The design solution of the wharf is feasible. 2. The included angle between the main axis of the wharf and the tides' direction is chosen to be less than 10º. 3. After the construction of the wharf, the peak tidal flow velocity that passes through the pile foundation of the wharf and the dike behind the wharf decreases by 10% to 15% and 30% to 50%, respectively. The range of the influence of buildings on the tidal current velocity is 900 m around the buildings. 4. The final siltation the upstream and downstream of the main axis of the wharf is 0.30 to 0.70 m, that on the dike at the rear edge of the wharf is 0.60 to 1.40 m from the wharf, and the final scour depth on the waterway of wharf apron is 0.03 to 0.05m.