Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Calcite dissolution and Ca–Mg ion exchange on carbonate rock surfaces have been proposed as potential mechanisms occurring during smart waterflooding in carbonate reservoirs. However, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of these reactions to quantitatively evaluate their effects in the reservoir flooding process. Especially, the data on precipitation and dissolution kinetics are insufficient. In this work, the equilibration kinetics of calcite dissolution and Ca–Mg exchange was experimentally studied. The behavior of three powders was compared: pure calcium carbonate, Stevns Klint outcrop chalk, and North Sea reservoir chalk. It was found that the equilibration time for calcite dissolution was of the order of seconds for a given surface-area-to-liquid-volume ratio. The existing theory of calcite dissolution could well reproduce our observations. The Ca–Mg exchange showed two-step kinetics: the first step was fast, and it dominated the process within the first hour of reaction; the second step was slow, and it continued longer than the time of observation (2 weeks). Characteristic times for the two steps were extracted by fitting the experimental curves. A two-layer adsorption model was proposed to characterize the kinetic process and successfully matched with experimental data. The findings were further extended to flow-through scenarios. By comparing with literature data and surface complexation models, it was concluded that calcite dissolution alone was unlikely to be able to explain the additional recovery reported in the literature. The Ca–Mg exchange process could dominate the fluid–rock interactions at a high temperature in pure calcium carbonate rocks, while competitive adsorption of cations appeared to control the process at a lower temperature. Different carbonate rocks possess different properties with regard to the ion-exchange process.
Compaction of the reservoir chalk (e.g. surface subsidence) may facilitate oil production. However, only few works have linked smart water flooding with chalk compaction and additional oil recovery. In this work, core flooding experiments with sequential injection of low salinity brines were performed to examine the effect of chalk compaction on oil recovery under smart water flooding. X-ray computer tomography scanning was applied to select outcrop and reservoir cores with different level of heterogeneity, which was demonstrated to be an important factor that determines the recovery even on core scale. A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) device made it possible to detect changes of the core length during the experiments, which served as an indication of the compaction. Overburden pressure was increased stepwise at the final stages of the flooding to achieve higher compaction of the cores. During secondary flooding, slight gradual compaction of the cores was observed. Subsequent low salinity flooding did not lead to further compaction for all the samples, nor additional oil recovery. Under final compaction, significantly more oil was produced from the heterogeneous cores, especially, from the reservoir core. Some fines production was observed during the core cleaning after the experiments. Fluid diversion due to closing micro-fractures under compaction and/or relocation of the fines is speculated to be a driving mechanism behind additional recovery from heterogeneous cores. Rock compaction appears to be a potential mechanism for enhanced oil recovery, however with a limited efficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.