Background:
Heart rate characteristics aid early detection of late-onset sepsis (LOS), but respiratory data contain additional signatures of illness due to infection. Predictive models using cardiorespiratory data may improve early sepsis detection. We hypothesized that heart rate (HR) and oxygenation (SpO
2
) data contain signatures that improve sepsis risk prediction over HR or demographics alone.
Methods:
We analyzed cardiorespiratory data from very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500g) infants admitted to three NICUs. We developed and externally validated four machine learning models to predict LOS using features calculated every 10m: mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis of HR and SpO
2
, and cross-correlation. We compared feature importance, discrimination, calibration, and dynamic prediction across models and cohorts. We built models of demographics and HR or SpO
2
features alone for comparison with HR-SpO
2
models.
Results:
Performance, feature importance, and calibration were similar among modeling methods. All models had favorable external validation performance. The HR-SpO
2
model performed better than models using either HR or SpO
2
alone. Demographics improved the discrimination of all physiologic data models but dampened dynamic performance.
Conclusions:
Cardiorespiratory signatures detect LOS in VLBW infants at 3 NICUs. Demographics risk-stratify, but predictive modeling with both HR and SpO
2
features provides the best dynamic risk prediction.
Background: Heart rate characteristics aid early detection of late-onset sepsis (LOS), but respiratory data contain additional signatures of illness due to infection. Predictive models using machine learning and cardiorespiratory data may improve early sepsis detection.
Objective: Test the hypothesis that heart rate (HR) and oxygenation (SpO2) data contain signatures that improve continuous sepsis risk prediction over HR or demographics alone.
Methods: We analyzed cardiorespiratory data from very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500g) infants admitted to three NICUs from 2012-2021 with annotated blood cultures. We developed and externally validated four machine learning models to predict imminent LOS using features calculated every 10m: mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis of HR and SpO2, and their cross-correlation. We compared feature importance, discrimination, calibration, and dynamic risk prediction across modeling methods and cohorts. We built logistic regression models of demographics and HR or SpO2 features alone for comparison with HR-SpO2 models.
Results: Data were available for 2,494 VLBW infants who had 302 LOS events. Performance, feature importance, and calibration were similar among modeling methods. SD of HR, skewness of HR, and kurtosis of SpO2 ranked as important features most consistently across models. All models had favorable external validation performance. The HR-SpO2 model performed better than models using either HR or SpO2 alone. Demographics improved the discrimination of all physiologic data models but dampened their dynamic performance.
Conclusion: Cardiorespiratory signatures detect LOS in VLBW infants at 3 NICUs. Demographics risk-stratify, but predictive modeling with both HR and SpO2 features provides the best dynamic risk prediction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.