Mechanically induced biological responses in bone cells involve a complex biophysical process. Although various mechanosensors have been identified, the precise mechanotransduction pathway remains poorly understood. PIEZO1 is a newly discovered mechanically activated ion channel in bone cells. This study aimed to explore the involvement of PIEZO1 in mechanical loading (fluid shear stress)‐induced signaling cascades that control osteogenesis. The results showed that fluid shear stress increased PIEZO1 expression in MC3T3‐E1 cells. The fluid shear stress elicited the key osteoblastic gene Runx‐2 expression; however, PIEZO1 silencing using small interference RNA blocked these effects. The AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin pathway was activated in this process. PIEZO1 silencing impaired mechanically induced activation of the AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin pathway. Therefore, the results demonstrated that MC3T3‐E1 osteoblasts required PIEZO1 to adapt to the external mechanical fluid shear stress, thereby inducing osteoblastic Runx‐2 gene expression, partly through the AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin pathway.

No abstract

Background: For various reasons, some elderly patients with femoral neck fracture undergo delayed surgical treatment. There is little information about the effect of delayed treatment on postoperative hip function and quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of delayed hip arthroplasty on hip function, quality of life, and satisfaction in patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods: Forty-seven patients with femoral neck fracture and hip replacement delayed over 21 days served as the delayed group (D group). Patients with femoral neck fracture, matched 1:1 for age and sex, and hip replacement within 7 days served as the control group (C group). The Harris hip score (HHS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed before surgery and 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The satisfaction questionnaires were completed by the patients themselves at the last follow-up. Results: The HHS in the C group was lower than that in the D group (32.64 ± 9.11 vs. 46.32 ± 9.88, P < 0.05) before surgery but recovered faster after surgery. The HHS in the D group was lower than that in the C group 1 year postoperatively (85.2 ± 3.80 vs. 89.8 ± 3.33, P < 0.05). The patients' quality of life changed similarly to their HHS. The HHS 1 year after surgery was related to the preoperative HHS in group D (r s = 0.521, P < 0.01). Patients in the D group showed significantly higher satisfaction scores than those in the C group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hip function in patients with femoral neck fracture surgery delayed over 21 days recovered more slowly than that in those who underwent surgery within 7 days. However, they were more satisfied with the surgery. Moderate hip movement to ameliorate the lower limb muscle atrophy was recommended for patients facing a temporary inability to undergo surgery.

BackgroundMuscle strength has been shown to exert positive effects on bone health. The causal relationship between hand grip strength and osteoporosis is an important public health issue but is not fully revealed. The goal of this study was to investigate whether and to what extent hand grip strength affects bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk.MethodsWe conducted a state-of-the-art two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Genomewide significant (P&lt;5×10-8) single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with hand grip strength were obtained. Summary level data of BMD and fractures at different body sites (lumbar spine, heel, forearm and femoral neck) was obtained from a large-scale osteoporosis database. The inverse variance weighted method was the primary method used for analysis, and the weighted-median, MR-Egger were utilized for sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe results provided strong evidence that hand grip strength trait was causally and positively associated with lumbar spine BMD (β: 0.288, 95% CI: 0.079 to 0.497; P=0.007), while no causal relationship was found between hand grip strength and BMD at heel (β: -0.081, 95% CI: -0.232 to 0.070; P=0.295), forearm (β: 0.-0.101, 95% CI: -0.451 to 0.248; P=0.571) or femoral neck (β: 0.054, 95% CI: -0.171 to 0.278; P=0.639). In addition, no statistically significant effects were observed for hand grip strength on fracture risks (β: -0.004, 95% CI: -0.019 to 0.012; P=0.662).ConclusionsThis study showed a positive causal relationship between hand grip strength and lumbar BMD, which is the most common site of osteoporotic fracture, but did not find a causal relationship between hand grip strength and BMD of heel, forearm, or femoral neck. No statistically significant effect of hand grip strength on fracture risk was observed. This study indicates variations in the abilities of hand grip strength trait to causally influence BMD at different skeleton sites. These results should be considered in further studies and public health measures on osteoporosis prevention strategies.

No abstract