Purpose To diagnose chronic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury, three different physical examinations were compared: the anterior drawer test (ADT), the anterolateral drawer test (ALDT), and the reverse anterolateral drawer test (RALDT). Methods A total of 72 ankles from potential ATFL-injured patients and the normal population were included and examined using the ADT, ALDT, and RALDT by two examiners without knowing the injury histories of any of the participants. Ultrasound examination was then applied as the gold standard to divide the ankles into the ATFL-injured group and the control group. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), false negative rate (FNR), false positive rate (FPR), accuracy, κ value, and p value of the two examiners' diagnoses were calculated to assess the diagnostic ability of each examination. Results There were 38 ankles in the injured group and 34 ankles in the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and included ankles. In the ADT and ALDT groups, the specificity reached one, while the sensitivity was relatively low (0.053 and 0.477 for the junior examiner and 0.395 and 0.500 for the senior examiner). In the RALDT, both the sensitivity and specificity were greater than 85% (0.868 and 0.912 for the senior examiner and 0.921 and 0.882 for the junior examiner). The κ value of the RALDT (0.639) was higher than that of the ALDT (0.528) and the ADT (0.196), whereas all the p values were less than 0.05. ConclusionThe ADT and ALDT are valuable physical tests to assess ATFL injuries. Compared with the traditional ADT and ALDT, however, the RALDT is more sensitive and accurate in diagnosing chronic ATFL injuries. Level of evidence II (diagnostic). KeywordsAnkle sprains • Anterior talofibular ligament • Anterior drawer test • Anterolateral drawer test • Reverse anterolateral drawer test * Yinghui Hua

We report the green electrochemical synthesis of size-controlled AgNPs by tuning the flow velocity in a continuous flow system, and an improved multi-electrode design for increasing the synthesis yield in unit time.

There is no established diagnostic criteria or widely accepted severity classification of localized scleroderma (LS) by imaging. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology by normalized mean shear wave velocity (SWV) may be as a probing tool for diagnosing and staging LS accurately and objectively. Fifty‐six patients with LS of inflammatory (n = 21), sclerotic (n = 24) and atrophic (n = 11) stage and 30 healthy controls were evaluated on the basis of pathological results. Dermal thickness, ARFI quality (elastography score) and quantity (mean SWV) were measured by ultrasonography (US), diagnosis and stage performances of LS using the dermal thickness, elastography score and mean SWV compared with modified localized scleroderma skin severity index (mLoSSI) were evaluated. Significant differences in the dermal thickness, elastography score and mean SWV were found between the normal adult and LS patients; for diagnosing LS, the area under the receiver–operator curves (AUROC) of the dermal thickness, elastography score, mean SWV and mLoSSI were 0.93 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.03 and 0.93 ± 0.02, respectively. Compared with the dermal thickness, the elastography score and mLoSSI, the AUROC and the specificities of mean SWV for differentiating sclerotic from inflammatory stage and atrophic from sclerotic LS increased significantly, especially by normalized mean SWV (AUROC, 0.84 ± 0.06 and 0.83 ± 0.07; specificity, 85.71% and 91.67%). As non‐invasive methods, mean SWV and dermal thickness by US may provide reliable information to diagnose and stage LS compared with mLoSSI especially by normalized mean SWV.