Background According to the literature, pigmentary disorders have a significantly negative impact on a person’s health-related quality of life. Moreover, among pigmentary disorders, incidence of melasma ranks high. The Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) is the scale that is generally used to evaluate a melasma-affected area and its severity. However, the relationship between the MASI and Melasma Quality of Life (MELASQoL) scores, as well as the impact of melasma on patients’ quality of life, remain unclear. Objectives To explore the influence of melasma on patients’ lives, analyze the relationship between the MASI and MELASQoL scores, and identify the factors that may be influencing the quality of life of patients with melasma. Methods Two reviewers independently searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for literature on quality of life of patients with melasma. In addition to an epidemiological study, a cross-sectional study, and validation studies, gray literature was also included. StataSE version 16 software was used for the meta-analysis. The score of each item on the MELASQoL scale was determined using a random-effects model. Results Fourteen studies with a total of 1398 melasma patients were included in the systematic review, four of which were eligible for meta-analysis. The relationship between the MELASQoL and MASI scores was found to be mixed. Five studies concluded that the MASI and MELASQoL scores were statistically correlated, while seven studies found no statistical correlation between the two. It is obvious that melasma causes emotional distress and has a negative impact on patients’ social lives. Patients were most bothered by the appearance of their skin condition. However, the MELASQoL score had no definite correlation with patient characteristics such as age, education levels, and history. Conclusion Melasma has a significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life. Thus, evaluating the quality of life of patients with melasma should not be ignored. Additionally, utilization of the MELASQoL scale should be considered in the care plan. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the relationship between melasma and quality of life.

Background Studies have investigated whether patients with lichen planus are at a high risk of metabolic syndrome; however, currently, no conclusive data are available in this regard. Objective This meta-analysis was performed to analyze the published literature investigating the association between metabolic syndrome and lichen planus. Method Two reviewers independently searched 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science) for observational studies assessing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with lichen planus. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to statistically analyze the data. Results 200 relevant articles were searched. After a further reading, 12 studies with 1422 participants (715 with LP and 707 controls) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Overall, the pooled odds ratio based on random effects analysis was 2.81 (95% confidence interval: 1.79-4.41, P<0.00001). This meta-analysis shows that compared with the general population, patients with lichen planus are more likely to develop metabolic syndrome. Subgroup analysis of prevalence of metabolic syndrome showed higher odds ratio in studies using International Diabetes Federation diagnostic criteria (odds ratio 4.65) and the Harmonized criteria (odds ratio 26.62) than studies using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (odds ratio 1.75), and thus might be more appropriate for diagnosing metabolic syndrome.

No abstract