Television exposure is not independently associated with child language development when adult-child conversations are controlled. Adult-child conversations are robustly associated with healthy language development. Parents should be encouraged not merely to provide language input to their children through reading or storytelling, but also to engage their children in two-sided conversations.
We analyze the microstructure of child-adult interaction during naturalistic, daylong, automatically labeled audio recordings (13,836 hours total) of children (8- to 48-month-olds) with and without autism. We find that adult responses are more likely when child vocalizations are speech-related. In turn, a child vocalization is more likely to be speech-related if the previous speech-related child vocalization received an immediate adult response. Taken together, these results are consistent with the idea that there is a social feedback loop between child and caregiver that promotes speech-language development. Although this feedback loop applies in both typical development and autism, children with autism produce proportionally fewer speech-related vocalizations and the responses they receive are less contingent on whether their vocalizations are speech-related. We argue that such differences will diminish the strength of the social feedback loop with cascading effects on speech development over time. Differences related to socioeconomic status are also reported.
The results offer new insight into the landscape of the early language environment, with clinical implications for identification of children at-risk for impoverished language environments.
For generations the study of vocal development and its role in language has been conducted laboriously, with human transcribers and analysts coding and taking measurements from small recorded samples. Our research illustrates a method to obtain measures of early speech development through automated analysis of massive quantities of day-long audio recordings collected naturalistically in children's homes. A primary goal is to provide insights into the development of infant control over infrastructural characteristics of speech through large-scale statistical analysis of strategically selected acoustic parameters. In pursuit of this goal we have discovered that the first automated approach we implemented is not only able to track children's development on acoustic parameters known to play key roles in speech, but also is able to differentiate vocalizations from typically developing children and children with autism or language delay. The method is totally automated, with no human intervention, allowing efficient sampling and analysis at unprecedented scales. The work shows the potential to fundamentally enhance research in vocal development and to add a fully objective measure to the battery used to detect speech-related disorders in early childhood. Thus, automated analysis should soon be able to contribute to screening and diagnosis procedures for early disorders, and more generally, the findings suggest fundamental methods for the study of language in natural environments.
These data support the hypothesis that early talk and interaction, particularly during the relatively narrow developmental window of 18 to 24 months of age, can be used to predict school-age language and cognitive outcomes. With these findings, we underscore the need for effective early intervention programs that support parents in creating an optimal early language learning environment in the home.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.