This paper has been undertaken by people with experience with mental health issues and mental health care systems. The aim of the research was to explore psychiatric inpatients' strategies for coping with mental ill health and in what ways acute inpatient psychiatric hospital services are facilitative to the individual attempting recovery. Ten focus groups were facilitated and data were analysed through systematic content analysis. Findings revealed that the main areas of concern for inpatients were: information, communication, relationships, activities, self-help, patient involvement in care treatment plans, and the physical environment. The authors also make a case to improve the status of user-led research as a means to understand the needs of mental health service users.

No abstract

Within contemporary mental health-care, power relationships are regularly played out between psychiatric nurses and service users. These power relationships are often imperceptible to the practicing nurse. For instance, in times of distress, service users often turn to or/and 'construct' discourses, beliefs and knowledge that are at odds with those which psychiatric nurses rely on to inform them of the mental status of the service user. The psychiatric nurse is in the position to impose knowledge onto service users, usually in concurrence with 'traditional or bio-psychiatry', without realizing or failing to acknowledge that the service user may have an alternative explanation of his/her mental health problems/experiences. In this paper, practice examples, based on the experiences of the four authors (from within and outside of services), are used to illustrate this 'hidden' power relationship. The authors use Foucault's ideas about: (i) government; (ii) the knowledge/power nexus and resistance; (iii) and his analytic tool of genealogy to help unravel this paradox within psychiatric nursing practice. The authors also use the emerging discourse of recovery as an alternative (and challenge) to 'traditional bio-psychiatry' and consider the implications for psychiatric nursing practice.

Violence and assaultive behaviour is a serious and growing problem in psychiatric services across the world. Despite many concerns about violence and assault in healthcare, there is an alarming lack of clarity on matters of procedure and policy pertaining to safety and security in psychiatric hospitals. This paper describes the safety and security measures in psychiatric acute admission wards in the Republic of Ireland and may be considered to be representative of acute psychiatric settings in other jurisdictions. A population study was undertaken, which included all psychiatric acute admission wards in the Republic. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, with the use of a questionnaire for data collection. The questionnaire was analysed using SPSS (version 11) and descriptive statistics were used to present the results. There was wide variation in safety and security practices across the wards. Measures aimed at ensuring staff security were also lacking, with no overall acceptable minimal standards discernible. It may be concluded that there is a lack of coherent policy and procedure in safety and security measures across psychiatric acute admission wards. One has to ask to what extent the disparate practices in safety and security revealed in the results of the study account for the escalation in violent episodes and assaultive behaviour in psychiatric services in recent years.

This article describes the structure, implementation, and early results of a performance-based hospital incentive program designed by a large nonprofit health plan. The Hospital Quality Service and Recognition program, developed by the Hawaii Medical Service Association, was launched in 2001 to reward high-quality medical care at the hospital level. This pay-for-performance program used administrative claims data, survey data, and hospital-reported information to assess hospital performance in risk-adjusted complications and risk-adjusted length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, and hospital processes of care measures. Financial incentives were provided to participating hospitals based on their performance on these measures. Preliminary outcomes of the program evaluated over a 4-year period after implementation revealed improvements in aggregated rates of risk-adjusted surgical complications and efficiency of care as evidenced by a substantial decrease in risk-adjusted average LOS for several surgical procedures. Quality improvement was demonstrated in several other program components including emergency department satisfaction. This quality incentive program offers an innovative approach for encouraging delivery of high-quality and service-oriented care in a statewide network of participating hospitals.