Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the overall prevalence of polypharmacy within the spinal cord injury (SCI) population, the level of polypharmacy with respect to seven classes of high-risk drugs commonly used to treat secondary conditions in the SCI population, and the overall risks for drug-related problems (DRP) related to polypharmacy. Design: A retrospective case-control design. Setting: A commercially available claims dataset that included patient cases from 4800 hospitals in the USA between 2007 and 2009. Participants: Individuals with tetraplegia, paraplegia, and those with SCI but not specified as either tetraplegia or paraplegia as well as a control population of randomly selected, age-and sex-matched individuals without a diagnosis of SCI. Outcome measures: The overall prevalence of polypharmacy, the prevalence of commonly prescribed high-risk medications, and the prevalence of reported DRPs. Results: Overall, the patients in the SCI population were prescribed significantly more medications than their control counterparts. There was a higher rate of individuals being prescribed medications from multiple highrisk classes (e.g. analgesic-narcotics, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, and skeletal muscle relaxer), as well as multiple medications within each class (e.g. multiple analgesic-narcotics). The SCI group had a higher incidence of DRPs. Conclusion: Our results are some of the first to demonstrate the extent of polypharmacy in individuals with SCI, including commonly prescribed high-risk medications, leading to a higher rate of DPRs. The higher rate of polypharmacy and DRPs can impact rehabilitation goals and community integration following neurologic injury.

Severe head trauma patients (HT) exhibit markedly elevated energy expenditure and 24-hr urinary urea nitrogen excretion (UUN) values. The objective of this study was to compare seven spinal cord injured patients (SCI) to seven HT for changes in UUN and measured energy expenditure (MEE) over the first 18 days following injury. Energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry and compared to values predicted by the Harris Benedict Equation (PEE). There were six quadriplegics and one paraplegic in the SCI group. HT patients had peak Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3 to 10 for the first 24 hr postinjury. Patients were studied prospectively and matched for age, sex, and admitting weight Week 1 following the injury, SCI had mean UUN values of 0.18 +/- 0.04 g/kg/day vs 0.18 +/- 0.01 for HT patients. The mean MEE/PEE ratio was 0.56 for the SCI and 1.4 for HT (p less than 0.01). Over the entire study period the mean UUN value for SCI was 0.23 +/- 0.03 g/kg vs 0.21 +/- 0.01 for HT. The mean MEE/PEE ratio for SCI was 0.94 while HT remained elevated at 1.5 (p less than 0.05). Although the UUN was comparable in SCI vs HT, there was a significant difference in MEE/PEE between the groups. The elevation in UUN observed in SCI is not due to a hypermetabolic state. This suggests that different mechanisms promote the increased nitrogen excretion observed in these two populations.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Intensive care unit recovery clinics (ICU‐RCs) have been proposed as a potential mechanism to address the multifaceted unmet needs of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and caregivers. The needs of this population include, but are not limited to, medication optimization, addressing physical function and psychological needs, coordination of care, and other interventions that may help in improving patient recovery and reducing the rate of preventable readmissions. The objective of this opinion paper is to identify and describe clinical pharmacy services for the management of ICU survivors and their caregivers in an ICU‐RC. The goals are to guide the establishment and development of clinical pharmacist involvement in ICU‐RCs and to highlight ICU recovery research and educational opportunities. Recommendations provided in this paper are based on the following: a review of published data on clinical pharmacist involvement in the ICU‐RCs; a consensus of clinical pharmacists who provide direct patient care to ICU survivors and caregivers; and a review of published guidelines and literature focusing on the management of ICU survivors and caregivers. These recommendations define areas of clinical pharmacist involvement in ICU‐RCs. Consequently, clinical pharmacists can promote education on Post Intensive Care Syndrome and Post Intensive Care Syndrome‐Family; improve medication adherence; facilitate appropriate referrals to primary care providers and specialists; ensure comprehensive medication management and medication reconciliation; provide assessment of inappropriate and appropriate medications after hospitalization; address adverse drug events, medication errors, and drug interactions; promote preventive measures; and facilitate medication acquisition with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing health care system costs.