BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the effects of femoral nerve block and adductor canal block on postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, and walking ability after primary total knee arthroplasty.MethodsBetween November 2014 and February 2015, 60 patients underwent primary total knee arthroplasty. Thirty patients received femoral nerve block and the other 30 received adductor canal block for postoperative pain control. Before spinal anesthesia, the patients received nerve block via a catheter (20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine was administered initially, followed by intermittent bolus injection of 10 mL 0.2% ropivacaine every 6 hours for 3 days). The catheters were maintained in the exact location of nerve block in 24 patients in the femoral nerve block group and in 19 patients in the adductor canal block group. Data collection was carried out from these 43 patients. To evaluate postoperative pain control, the numerical rating scale scores at rest and 45° flexion of the knee were recorded. To evaluate quadriceps strength, manual muscle testing was performed. Walking ability was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. We also evaluated analgesic consumption and complications of peripheral nerve block.ResultsNo significant intergroup difference was observed in the numerical rating scale scores at rest and 45° flexion of the knee on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The adductor canal block group had significantly greater quadriceps strength than did the femoral nerve block group, as assessed by manual muscle testing on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. The 2 groups showed no difference in walking ability on postoperative day 1, but on postoperative days 2, 3, walking ability was significantly better in the adductor canal block group than in the femoral nerve block group. No significant intergroup difference was observed in analgesic consumption.ConclusionsThe groups showed no difference in postoperative pain control. Adductor canal block was superior to femoral nerve block in preserving quadriceps strength and walking ability. However, adductor canal block was inferior to femoral nerve block in maintaining the exact location of the catheter.

The purposes of this study were (1) to compare lower limb alignment measurements between radiographs and computer-assisted surgery and (2) to evaluate the discrepancy in lower limb alignment between computer-assisted surgery with a high tibial osteotomy protocol and computer-assisted surgery with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) protocol in the same knee. Seventy-one TKAs were performed on patients with primary osteoarthritis using computer-assisted surgery. Preoperative lower limb alignment was measured using the mechanical axis during bipedal, weight-bearing, whole-leg anteroposterior radiography (measure 1). The intraoperative mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery according to the high tibial osteotomy protocol before joint exposure (measure 2). After changing the software and joint exposure, the intraoperative mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery according to TKA protocol (measure 3). After final TKA implantation, the lower limb mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery following the TKA protocol (measure 4). Postoperative lower limb alignment was measured using the mechanical axis on whole-leg standing anteroposterior radiographs (measure 5). The mechanical axis and median value from each group were compared. Factors affecting the mechanical axis measurement were also analyzed. The difference in the mechanical axis between measures 1 and 2, measures 1 and 3, and measures 2 and 3 was significant (P<.0001, <.0001, and =.0007, respectively). The difference between measures 4 and 5 was also significant (P<.0001). Factors affecting the mechanical axis measurement, such as age, height, weight, and range of motion, showed no correlation (R(2)=.07244 and adjusted R(2)=.01622). The pre- and postoperative radiological measurements of limb alignment using the mechanical axis were different from the intraoperative measurements with navigation.

Popliteal artery compression rarely occurs after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique that allows for direct visualization of the surgical field. However, we experienced a popliteal artery compression after PCL reconstruction performed using the technique, which eventually required re-operation. Here, we report this rare case and discuss reasons of popliteal artery compression.

No abstract

Clinical evaluation was performed by comparing the preoperative and last follow-up scores of Lysholm score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Results: All patients were male and the average age was 19.1 years. Of the 19 cases, there were 16 cases of medial femoral condyle lateral side lesion, 2 cases of lateral femoral condyle articular surface, and 1 case of femoral intercondylar notch lesions. The average size of the lesion was 5.68 mm 2 , and average use of osteochodral plugs were 4.3. Average follow-up period was 38 months. Preoperative Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score showed significant improvement. Conclusion: Fixation with autologous osteochondral plugs for unstable OCD uses the remnant tissues therefore conserving it, which is thought to be the positive aspect of this type of operation.