The objectives of our studies are to characterize the ability of dietary soybean components to inhibit the growth of prostate cancer in mice and alter tumor biomarkers associated with angiogenesis. Soy isoflavones (genistein or daidzein) or soy phytochemical concentrate inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells LNCaP, DU 145 and PC-3 in vitro, but only at supraphysiologic concentrations, i.e., 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) > 50 micromol/L. G2-M arrest and DNA fragmentation consistent with apoptosis of prostate cancer cells are also observed at concentrations causing growth inhibition. In contrast, the in vitro proliferation of vascular endothelial cells was inhibited by soy phytochemcials at much lower concentrations. We evaluated the ability of dietary soy phytochemical concentrate and soy protein isolate to inhibit the growth of the LNCaP human prostate cancer in severe combined immune-deficient mice. Mice inoculated subcutaneously with LNCaP cells (2 x 10(6)) were randomly assigned to one of the six dietary groups based on the AIN-76A formulation for 3 wk. A 2 x 3 factorial design was employed with two protein sources (20%, casein vs. soy protein) and three levels of soy phytochemical concentrate (0, 0.2 and 1.0% of the diet). Soy components did not alter body weight gain or food intake. Compared with casein-fed controls, the tumor volumes after 3 wk were reduced by 11% (P = 0.45) by soy protein, 19% (P = 0.17) by 0.2% soy phytochemical concentrate, 28% by soy protein with 0.2% soy phytochemical concentrate (P < 0.05), 30% by 1.0% soy phytochemical concentrate (P < 0.05) and 40% by soy protein with 1.0% soy phytochemical concentrate (P < 0.005). Histologic examination of tumor tissue showed that consumption of soy products significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation, increased apoptosis and reduced microvessel density. The angiogenic protein insulin-like growth factor-I was reduced in the circulation of mice fed soy protein and phytochemical concentrate. Our data suggest that dietary soy products may inhibit experimental prostate tumor growth through a combination of direct effects on tumor cells and indirect effects on tumor neovasculature.

Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that energy restriction reduces prostate tumor growth by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, dietary fat concentration does not influence prostate tumor growth when energy intake is reduced.

SMAD4 is localized to chromosome 18q21, a frequent site for loss of heterozygosity in advanced stage colon cancers. Although Smad4 is regarded as a signaling mediator of the TGFb signaling pathway, its role as a major suppressor of colorectal cancer progression and the molecular events underlying this phenomenon remain elusive. Here, we describe the establishment and use of colon cancer cell line model systems to dissect the functional roles of TGFb and Smad4 inactivation in the manifestation of a malignant phenotype. We found that loss of function of Smad4 and retention of intact TGFb receptors could synergistically increase the levels of VEGF, a major proangiogenic factor. Pharmacologic inhibition studies suggest that overactivation of the TGFbinduced MEK-Erk and p38-MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) auxiliary pathways are involved in the induction of VEGF expression in SMAD4 null cells. Overall, SMAD4 deficiency was responsible for the enhanced migration of colon cancer cells with a corresponding increase in matrix metalloprotease 9 enhanced hypoxiainduced GLUT1 expression, increased aerobic glycolysis, and resistance to 5 0 -fluoruracil-mediated apoptosis.Interestingly, Smad4 specifically interacts with hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1a under hypoxic conditions providing a molecular basis for the differential regulation of target genes to suppress a malignant phenotype. In summary, our results define a molecular mechanism that explains how loss of the tumor suppressor Smad4 promotes colorectal cancer progression. These findings are also consistent with targeting TGFb-induced auxiliary pathways, such as MEK-ERK, and p38-MAPK and the glycolytic cascade, in SMAD4-deficient tumors as attractive strategies for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Res; 71(3); 998-1008. Ó2011 AACR.