Background With the gradual severe bacterial resistance and slow development of antibiotics, drug-resistant bacterial strains are widely distributed and have become a serious public health problem. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) which cause Group B strep-related disease is the major cause of severe infection in newborns. However, Clindamycin resistance of GBS induced by Erythromycin is emerging and become important clinical concerns today. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the drug resistance analysis of GBS strains isolated from Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from Jan 2016 to Dec 2017. The clinical and microbiological data including patient demographics, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, relative distribution drug resistance-associated genes mefA & ermB to Erythromycin, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST typing) were collected and analyzed. The Kirby-Bauer and VITEK2-compact were used to perform the susceptibility testing. The double disk diffusion method (D-test) was used for the detection of inducible clindamycin resistance. MLST was employed to identify sequence types of these strains. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was conducted to detect the drug resistance genes mefA & ermB to Erythromycin. Results A total of 1021 strains were cultured and isolated from 31894 specimens. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance was 53.6%(547/1021)and 50.1 % (512/1021), respectively, in which 74.4%(407/547)had harbored constitutive macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance (cMLS B ), 45.0%(63/140)were inducible MLS B (iMLS B ). Additionally, MLST identified 12 different ST types including a new ST type ST1072 in 63 iMLS B GBS strains and the dominant STs were ST12 (30.1%) and ST19 (25.4%). The resistance ratio of ST19 to Levofloxacin (75.0%) was higher than that of other ST types. The relevance resistance ratio of mefA and ermB was respectively 27.0% and 41.3% among 63 GBS isolates. Conclusion Our study not only demonstrated a genetic diversity in iMLS B GBS in Shanghai through the analysis of MLST typing and resistance genes, but also found that there exist different distribution patterns of resistance and related resistance genes between different ST types. These findings would provide theoretical support for clinical prevention and treatment of resistant iMLS B GBS infection.
Objective Goal of this work is to assess the feasibility to perform COVID-19 RNA tests within hospitals and communities experiencing SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreaks, to ultimately provide recommendations for hospitals with so-called fever clinics. In China, these specialised clinics within a hospital, specifically receive outpatients who have fever symptoms.Methods A team with expertise in the Exposure Analysis of Critical Control Points (EACCP) framework first identified potential infection routes during the testing for SARS-CoV-2, then constructed and tested flow diagrams, which were confirmed under actual conditions, demonstrating the feasibility to be carried out in hospitals with fever clinics. The team determined critical control points to mitigate the exposure risks at each control point.Findings The sampling and inactivation steps of clinical samples in fever clinics appeared to be associated with particularly high risk levels of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Moderate levels of exposure were associated with storage and transportation of samples for inactivation; Low risk levels were associated with the transportation, storage and detection steps after inactivation.Conclusion To minimise risks of infection for personnel, optimised processes to carry out SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests in hospitals with fever clinics in China are proposed. The high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure during procedures preceding testing are the sampling and biological inactivation, which can be reduced by using full personal protective equipment and the use of BSL2 facilities in fever clinics or mobile BSL2 platforms. The implementation of the Exposure Analysis of Critical Control Points framework could facilitate rapid responses to outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.