Objective This systematic review delineates various exercise‐based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) designs and quantifies how they may be optimized in pediatric asthma treatment. Design Comprehensive systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and quality analyses using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and Medline searches. Interventions Discrete and combined endurance, respiratory, resistance, strength, and interval training. Main Outcome Measures Forced expiratory volume at 1 s to predicted value ratio (FEV1% pred), forced vital capacity to predicted value ratio (FVC% pred), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity ratio (FEF25%–75%), the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ), and the 6‐min walk test (6MWT). Results Twenty‐four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a combined 1031 patients were included. Endurance training was the most common form of PR (58.3%), typically conducted through outpatient clinics (29.2%). Network meta‐analysis showed that compared with other PR, interval training significantly improved PAQLQ total scores, and activity, symptom, and emotional domains. Interval training also had a significant effect on the 6MWT. No adverse events were reported. Exercise training did not have a significant effect on FEV1% pred; however, combined endurance and respiratory training significantly improved both FVC% pred and FEF25%–75%. Conclusions Exercise‐based PR is safe and effective in childhood asthma treatment. Interval training may be a core component for improving quality of life and exercise capacity in this patient population, while combined respiratory and endurance training may significantly affect lung function. The clinical efficacy of these results should be confirmed through high‐quality RCTs.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to systematize different designs of exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for children with asthma and explore which designs are optimal. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection and MEDLINE were searched up until April 01, 2021, which was conducted for any relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise-based PR in childhood asthma. Language is limited to English. Network meta-analyses and standard meta-analyses were performed using STATA (version 16.0), quality analyses were performed using RevMan (version 5.3). Results: A total of 24 RCTs involving 1031 patients were included. 14 studies were endurance training, which was the most commonly used form of exercise, and 7 studies rehabilitation sites were conducted in hospitals. A network meta-analysis showed that compared with other forms of exercise, interval training significantly improved the PAQLQ (Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), including activity scores [MD=3.02, 95% CI (1.74,4.30)], symptom scores [MD=2.68, 95% CI (2.04,3.32)], emotional scores [MD=2.47, 95% CI (0.91,4.03)], and total scores [MD=2.68, 95% CI (1.79,3.57)]. Interval training [MD=188.97, 95% CI (-59.27, 437.21)] also had a more significant effect on the 6MWT (6-minute walk test). No adverse events were found in this study. Exercise training had no significant effect on FEV (the forced expiratory volume at 1s to predicted value ratio) [WMD=0.59, 95% CI (-2.00, 3.19)], however, the combined of endurance training and respiratory training was found to significantly improve both FVC (the forced vital capacity to predicted value ratio) [MD=5.37, 95% CI (0.07,10.67)] and FEF25-75% (the forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity ratio) [WMD=11.31, 95% CI (2.13, 20.48)]. Conclusions: Exercise-based PR is a safe and effective for childhood asthma. Interval training may be a core component of improving quality of life and exercise capacity in childhood asthma, the combination of respiratory training and endurance training has significant effects on lung function.This result should be viewed with caution, and high-quality RCTs are still needed to confirm its clinical efficacy,