The present study demonstrates that excellent postoperative outcome can be achieved with the use of the ACAF. Though further study is required to confirm the conclusion, this novel technique has the potential to serve as an alternative surgical technique for the treatment of cervical OPLL. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

No abstract

Purpose To compare the incidence rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage between anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with dura ossification (DO). Methods In the period from June 2015 to June 2017, ACAF and ACCF were performed on patients with OPLL with DO. Double-layer sign was observed on axial bone window of CT images. The operation duration, blood loss, and hospital stay were measured. Radiologic assessment included occupying rate, type and extent of OPLL, decompression width, postoperative area of the spinal canal, and anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord. The JOA scoring system was used to evaluate the neurological status. Surgery-related complications such as CSF leakage and spinal cord or nerve injury were all recorded. Results There were 28 patients in ACAF group and 31 in ACCF group. On cross-sectional CT, decompression width and postoperative spinal canal area were both significantly larger in the ACAF group than that in the ACCF group (P < 0.01). The anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord was significantly larger in the ACAF group (P < 0.05). Mean JOA score was better in the ACAF group (P < 0.05). In the ACCF group, seven (22.6%) patients had CSF leakage. However, only one (3.6%) presented with CSF leakage in the ACAF group. The difference of incidence rate of CSF leakage was significant (P < 0.01). Conclusions ACAF, which can significantly reduce CSF leakage and achieve good neurological recovery, is a good option to treat cervical OPLL with DO.Haisong Yang and Jingchuan Sun contributed equally to this paper.

The technique of bridge crane is feasible and may be relatively safe and effective for the treatment of severe TOLF with myelopathy. However, further studies with large-scale cases and control groups are required to reveal the generalizability and safety of the bridge crane technique in the future. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Study Design: A retrospective study. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the bridge crane technique versus laminectomy for the treatment of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF). Methods: Totally 41 patients who underwent surgical decompression due to thoracic OLF from May 2017 to June 2018 in our institution were enrolled in this study and were divided into group BG (bridge crane technique, n = 19) and group L (laminoectomy, n = 22). Demographic data was collected from medical records and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the neurological outcomes during the follow-up. Surgery-related complications were analyzed. Results: The mean duration of follow-up was comparable between group BG (19.4 ± 1.5 months) and group L (19.6 ± 1.4 months). No statistical differences were observed between two groups in terms of gender, age, duration of symptoms, preoperative occupying rate, involved levels, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications. The JOA score significantly increased at the final follow-up in both groups. However, patients in group BG had higher JOA score and recovery rate ( P < 0.05). Four patients in group L experienced complications, including 3 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and one postoperative hematoma. Only one patient in group BG had CSF leakage. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that bridge crane technique may be relatively safe and effective for patients with symptomatic thoracic OLF with more satisfactory clinical improvement. However, high-quality studies are still required to validate the results of this study.