BackgroundPerioperative serum potassium levels are closely associated with postoperative clinical outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of our retrospective study was to identify the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative hypokalemia (before pneumoperitoneum) and to evaluate the influence of preoperative hypokalemia on the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function.MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal resection from November 11 2014 to October 20 2016, were considered for inclusion. A blood potassium level between 3.5 and 5.5 mmol/L was defined as normal, with levels between 3.0 to 3.5 mmol/L, 2.5 to 3.0 mmol/L and < 2.5 mmol/L considered as slight, moderate, and severe level of hypokalemia. The factors including age, gender, ASA grade, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, anti-hypertension drugs, lactose oral soluble, oral cathartics, oral cathartics, cathartic enemas, and blood potassium level before gastrointestinal preparation which might be associated with blood potassium level before pneumoperitoneum were analysed. The time to postoperative first flatus (FFL) and first feces (FFE) was compared between patients with and without hypokalemia.ResultsThe final analysis was based on the data of 108 patients. Hypokalemia was identified in 70.37% patients, with the following distribution of blood potassium levels before pneumoperitoneum: slight, 49 (45.37%) patients; moderate, 23 (21.30%); and severe, 4 (3.70%) patients. Hypokalemia was significantly associated with hypertension and the use of ≥2 types of oral cathartics for preoperative gastrointestinal preparation. With treatment, potassium levels recovered to normal levels in all patients within 48 h postoperatively. Hypokalemia was associated with a longer postoperative time to first feces, compared to patients with a normal potassium level before pneumoperitoneum.ConclusionsOur findings underlie the importance of early monitoring and management of serum potassium levels in these patients.

BackgroundThe present survey evaluated the incidence of perioperative cardiac arrests in a Chinese tertiary general teaching hospital over ten years.MethodsThe incidence of cardiac arrest that occurred within 24 h of anaesthesia administration was retrospectively identified in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between August 2007 and October 2017. Overall, 152,513 anaesthetics were included in the study period. Data collected included patient characteristics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, surgical specialty and anaesthesia technique. Cardiac arrests were assigned to one of three groups: “anaesthesia-related”, “anaesthesia-contributing” or “anaesthesia-unrelated”.ResultsIn total, 104 cardiac arrests (6.8:10,000) and 34 deaths (2.2:10,000) were obtained. Among them, eleven cardiac arrests events were anaesthesia-related, resulting in an incidence of 0.7 per 10,000 anaesthetics. Sixteen cardiac arrests events were found to be anaesthesia-contributing, resulting in an incidence of 1.0 per 10,000 anaesthetics. Cardiovascular adverse events were the major events that contributed to anaesthesia-related cardiac arrest. Differences were found between events related and unrelated to anaesthesia with regard to ASA physical status and anaesthesia technique (P < 0.05).ConclusionsAnaesthesia-related cardiac arrest occurred in 11 of 104 cardiac arrests within 24 h of anaesthesia administration. Most cardiac arrests related to anaesthesia were due to cardiovascular events, including arrhythmia and hypotension after intravenous narcotic, as well as haemorrhage. ASA physical status of at least 3 and subarachnoid block appeared to be relevant risk factors for anaesthesia-related cardiac arrest.

Background Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) belong to few neuromuscular disorders mainly involving pelvic and shoulder girdle muscles. Also, cardiac or pulmonary complications, increased rhabdomyolysis risk when exposed to volatile anesthetics and succinylcholine may increase anesthesia related risks. However, current reports about the anesthesia management of these patients are limited. Case presentation We described our anesthetic management of a 36 years old woman with LGMD 2B receiving arthroscopic knee surgery. In consideration of the high risk of rhabdomyolysis, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was selected for her surgery. Considering the unpredictable respiratory depression, opioid based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was replaced with an intra-articular cocktail therapy consisting of 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine. Also, we reviewed the literatures on anesthetic management of LGMD through searching PubMed, in order to provide a comprehensive and safe guidance for the surgery. Conclusions Carefully conducted general anesthesia with TIVA technique is a good choice for LGMD patients. Neuraxial anesthesia may be used if general anesthesia needs to be avoided. To warrant safe anesthesia for surgery, any decision must be well thought out during perioperative period.

No abstract