School engagement (SE) refers to the intensity and quality of emotions experienced by students when commencing and carrying out learning activities, and includes behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. A high SE level promotes academic achievement, reduces students' behavioral problems, and prevents school dropout. This study, whose participants were 819 students from Tibetan areas, explored the impact of teacher autonomy support (TAS) on students' SE and the mechanisms involved in this relationship. The results showed that TAS had a positive impact on SE, while students' self-efficacy had a mediating effect between TAS and SE. On the one hand, TAS affected self-efficacy through academic interest and ultimately influenced SE; moreover, TAS negatively affected academic anxiety, indirectly inhibiting the negative effect of academic anxiety on SE through self-efficacy. The theoretical and practical implications of the study findings are discussed.
This study aimed to explore the mediating role of emotional regulation strategies in the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and subjective well-being (SWB) among Chinese university teachers, and evaluate whether effort-reward imbalance moderated the mediating effect of emotional regulation strategies. A total of 308 Chinese university teachers were recruited for this study. The results showed that emotional regulation strategies played a partial mediating role in the relationship between EI and SWB. Moreover, an effort-reward imbalance moderated the relationship between emotional regulation strategies and SWB. For individuals with more balanced perceptions, EI had a significant effect on SWB via cognitive reappraisal, while for individuals with more imbalanced perceptions, EI did not have a significant effect on SWB via cognitive reappraisal. These findings provide a better understanding of the effects of EI and emotional regulation strategies on SWB, which could provide interventions for promoting SWB among teachers.
This study examined the differences in critical thinking levels among students with different levels of academic engagement in STEAM courses. In this study, 30 college students were selected as subjects. Before experimenting, they received the academic engagement test and were divided into high, medium, and low groups based on their performance. Then, each group received three STEAM sessions and was asked to complete a topic discussion task. The results show that there are significant differences in the critical thinking level of students with different levels of academic engagement. Specifically, the students with a medium level of academic engagement had the highest critical thinking. Research has shown that the level of academic engagement affects the critical thinking of students in STEAM courses.
In the real world, there are many complex networks with a fixed number of nodes, such as the friendship network in a class of a university. In this paper, we propose a "friends of a friend" based network (FFB network for short) model, in which the mechanism leading to a friendship connection between two persons is based on "friends of a friend": a person always try to strike up friendships with the friends of his friends. In the following experiment, we simulate the growing process of the FFB network and measure its average degree, degree distribution and clustering coefficient at different evolving stages. We also compare the FFB network with random network. The experiment results show that there are great differences between them in evolving process, degree distribution and clustering coefficient. Then, we give a mathematical expression of average degree in the FFB model and compare it with simulation results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.