Objective. To analyze the risk factors for osteochondral fracture (OCF) of first-time acute patellar dislocation (APD) through measurements of patellofemoral anatomy in adolescents. Methods. In this prospective study, all patients were divided into two groups according to whether OCF was detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Group A (associated with OCF) and Group B (without OCF). Patellofemoral anatomy was evaluated with four aspects including trochlear/patellar dysplasia, patella location, patellofemoral matching, and morphologic classification. On MRI scans, trochlear facet asymmetry ratio (TFAR), lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), sulcus angle (SA), trochlear depth (TD), and patellar depth (PD) were measured to assess trochlear/patellar dysplasia. Insall–Salvati index (ISI), Caton–Deschamps index (CDI), Blackburne–Peel index (BPI), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), patellar tilt angle (PTA), and lateral patellar displacement (LPD) were measured to show the location of patella. Patellofemoral matching was analyzed through the measurements of patellofemoral congruence angle (PFCA), patellofemoral index (PFI), and patellotrochlear index (PTI). Results. A total of ninety-four adolescents from 49 boys and 45 girls (mean age, 15 years; range, 10–18 years) with first-time APD were recruited and included in Group A (65) and Group B (29). The PFI (2.62 ± 0.51 vs. 2.10 ± 0.44) and PTI (0.28 ± 0.05 vs. 0.22 ± 0.07) were significantly higher in Group B than Group A P < 0.05 . There were no significant differences in other quantitative outcomes of the two groups P > 0.05 . The distribution of Dejour/Wiberg classification was statistically similar between the two groups P > 0.05 . Conclusions. Adolescent patients with first-time APD complicating OCF have closer morphologic features of patellofemoral dysplasia and patella location when compared to adolescents without OCF. Abnormal patellofemoral matching increases the risk of OCF after first-time APD in adolescents.

Background To describe and analyze the morphological characteristics, location and frequency of pure transverse acetabular fracture lines through fracture mapping and quantitative measurements. Methods Transverse fractures were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All computed tomography (CT) data were used for reconstruction and manual reduction. The reductive fracture fragments were graphically overlaid onto a three-dimensional (3D) right hemipelvis template. Then, the fracture lines were accurately depicted onto the surface of the 3D template. The fracture lines were overlapped onto the model to create the 3D fracture map and heatmap. All cases were subdivided into infratectal (62-B1.1), juxtatectal (62-B1.2), and transtectal (62-B1.3) types based on the AO Foundation/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. Some anatomic parameters of the transverse fractures were also analyzed in these 3 groups. Results Our study included forty-nine transverse fractures from 32 male and 17 female patients (mean age, 42 years; range 21–74 years) and included 19 type 62-B1.1, 17 type 62-B1.2, and 13 type 62-B1.3 fractures. The average anterior rim fracture angle was 70.0° (± 11.6°), and the posterior rim fracture angle was 92.4° (± 28.5°). The anterior rim fracture angles in 40 cases (40/49, 81.6%) fell within a wide range between 63° and 80°. On the heatmap, the hot zones were located on the highest position of the cotyloid fossa and the narrowed region, and the cold zone was on the inferior third of the articular surface. For type 62-B1.3 fractures, the hot zone was located on the posterior of the acetabular dome. There were no significant differences in anterior rim fracture angle and anterior height among the three patterns (P = 0.071, P = 0.072). Post hoc tests of the posterior rim fracture angle and the posterior height revealed significant differences among fracture subtypes (P < 0.01). The posterior intra-articular fracture line was significantly longer than the anterior intra-articular fracture line in type 62-B1.1 and type 62-B1.2 fractures (P < 0.01). Conclusion The fracture lines of transverse fractures through the anterior rim were concentrated on the narrowed zone, and the posterior fracture lines were diffusely distributed. The intra-articular fracture line distribution was focused on the superior and middle thirds of the joint surface. The recurrent fracture lines involving the weight-bearing dome mainly converged on the posterior region of the roof.