Aims:To compare the efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) as monotherapy or add-on to metformin (Met) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Materials and Methods:PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov sites were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of DPP-4is and SGLT-2is in patients with T2DM. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used to evaluate outcomes.Results: In the analysis of 25 randomized trials, which involved 14 619 patients, SGLT-2is were associated with a significantly stronger reduction in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (WMD 0.13%, 95% credible interval [CI], 0.04%-0.22%, P = .005) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD 0.80 mmol/L, 95% CI, 0.58-1.01 mmol/L, P < .00001) than were DPP-4is. However, no significant difference between the 2 drug categories was found in the risk of hypoglycaemic events (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78-1.26, P = .92). SGLT-2is plus Met was associated with a more significant decrease in FPG (WMD 0.71 mmol/L, 95% CI, 0.43-1.00 mmol/L, P < .00001) than was DPP-4is plus Met. However, no differences were found in the reduction of HbA1c (WMD 0.11%, 95% CI, −0.03%-0.25%, P = .12) or the risk of hypoglycaemic events (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80-1.31, P = .86).Conclusions: This review revealed that, compared to DPP-4is, SGLT-2is significantly reduced HbA1c, FPG and body weight without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in diabetes treatment.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| Data sources and search strategyElectronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov sites from inception to May 1, 2017 using the following search terms: linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, DPP-4is, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, ertugliflozin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, SGLT-2is. There was no restriction on language of publication.The reference lists of the related studies were manually examined to identify any additional publications relevant to our analysis.
| Inclusion and exclusion criteriaInclusion criteria were as follows: (1 Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) trials involving animals or healthy human subjects; (2) non-randomized trials; (3) letters or case reports; (4) articles that provided inadequate information of interest or primary data; (5) trials with a duration of less than 12 weeks.
| Study selection and data extractionTwo independent researchers (Z. W. and J. S.) screened the search results and selected studies in strict accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any resulting discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third researcher (X. D.).The following data were independently extracted from the studies using a standardized form that included: trial characteristics (first author, publication year, sample size, duration of therapy, medications, the National Clinical Trial number); participants' baseline (age, gender, HbA...