Objective No approved pharmacotherapies are available for patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF).In the present work, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone for the treatment of IPAF. MethodsA retrospective cohort study consisting of patients who met diagnostic criteria for IPAF was performed after a multidisciplinary review, and the patients receiving pirfenidone were compared with those in the non-pirfenidone group.The baseline data and diagnostic characteristics of patients were assessed. Pulmonary function and prednisone dose were analysed by a mix-effects model. ResultsA total of 184 patients, who met the diagnostic criteria of IPAF, were divided into two groups: pirfenidone group (n=81) and non-pirfenidone group (n=103). Patients in the pirfenidone group had a lower forced vital capacity (FVC%, p<0.001) and a lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%, p=0.003). The pirfenidone group exhibited a greater increase of FVC% at 6 (p=0.003), 12 (p=0.013), and 24 (p=0.003) months. After adjustment for sex, age, UIP pattern, baseline FVC% and DLCO%, patients in the pirfenidone group continued to show a greater improvement in FVC% (χ 2 (1)=4.59, p=0.032). Subgroup analysis identified superior therapeutic effects of pirfenidone in patients with dosage >600 mg/day (p=0.010) and medication course >12 months (p=0.007). Besides, the pirfenidone group had a lower prednisone dose than the non-pirfenidone group after 12 months of treatment (p=0.002). Moreover, 17 patients (19.32%) experienced side effects after taking pirfenidone, including one case of anaphylactic shock. ConclusionPirfenidone (600-1,800 mg/day) might help improve FVC, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in IPAF patients.

Background: Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy is customarily conducted under computed tomography (CT) guidance, which primarily depends on the conductors' experience and inevitably contributes to long procedural duration and radiation exposure. Novel technique facilitating lung biopsy is currently demanded. Methods:Based on the reconstructed anatomical information of CT scans, a three-dimensionally printed navigational template was customized to guide fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The needle insertion site and angle could be indicated by the template after proper placement according to the reference landmarks. From June 2020 to August 2020, patients with peripheral indeterminate lung lesions ≥30 mm in diameter were enrolled in a pilot trial. Cases were considered successful when the virtual line indicated by the template in the first CT scan was pointing at the target, and the rate of success was recorded. The insertion deviation, procedural duration, radiation exposure, biopsy-related complications, and diagnostic yield were documented as well.Results: A total of 20 patients consented to participate, and 2 withdrew. The remaining 18 participants consisting of 11 men and 7 women with a median age of 63 [inter-quartile range (IQR), 50-68] years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 23.5 (IQR,) kg/m 2 received template-guided FNA. The median nodule size of the patients was 41.2 (IQR, 36.2-51.9) mm and 17 lesions were successfully targeted (success rate, 94.4%). One lesion was not reached through the designed trajectory due to an unpredictable alteration of the lesion's location resulting from pleural effusion. The median deviation between the actual position ^ ORCID: Haoran E, 0000-0002-9160-7646; Chang Chen, 0000-0002-9981-3110. of the needle tip and the designed route was 9.4 (IQR, 6.8-11.7) mm. The median procedural duration was 10.7 (IQR, 9.7-11.8) min, and the median radiation exposure was 220.9 (IQR,) mGy×cm. No major biopsy-related complication was encountered. Definitive diagnosis of malignancy was reached in 13 of the 17 (76.5%) participants. Conclusions:The feasibility and safety of navigational template-guided FNA were preliminarily validated in lung biopsy cohort. Nonetheless, patients with pleural effusion were not recommended to undergo FNA guided by such technique.

Background To explore if chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) can make higher accurate stages for thoracic sarcoidosis stage than X-ray (CRX) only. Methods Clinical data from medical records of consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 1 2012 to December 31 2016 and consecutive patients treated at the Sarcoidosis Center of University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio, USA from January 1 2010 to December 31 2015 were reviewed. The clinical records of 227 patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis (140 Chinese and 87 American) were reviewed. Their sarcoidosis stage was determined by three thoracic radiologists based on CXR and HRCT presentations, respectively. The stage determined from CXR was compared with that determined from HRCT. Results Overall, 50.2% patients showed discordant sarcoidosis stage between CXR and HRCT (52.9% in Chinese and 44.8% in American, respectively). The primary reason for inconsistent stage between CXR and HRCT was failure to detect mediastinal lymph node enlargement in the shadow of the heart in CXR (22.1%) and small nodules because of the limited resolution of CXR (56.6%). Stage determined from HRCT negatively correlated with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) significantly (P < .01) but stage determined from CXR did not. Pleural involvement was detected by HRCT in 58 (25.6%) patients but only in 17 patients (7.5%) by CXR. Patients with pleural involvement had significantly lower forced vital capacity and DLCO than patients without it (both P < .05). Conclusion Revised staging criteria based on HRCT presentations included 5 stages with subtypes in the presence of pleural involvement were proposed. Thoracic sarcoidosis can be staged more accurately based on chest HRCT presentations than based on CXR presentations. Pleural involvement can be detected more accurately by HRCT.