The extent of failure evaluation depends on the complexity and significance of electronic products. However, traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has many shortcomings, which brings large difficulty to failure evaluating work. This paper uses the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLTS) and the K-means clustering algorithm to improve the shortcomings of traditional FMEA. The DHHFLTS is a set of language terms based on the symmetry method and uniform language granularity. Firstly, we determine the product failure mode and set up an evaluation team after formulating an evaluation symmetrical language set. The psychological changes of the evaluators can be truly expressed by using the DHHFLTS. Secondly, the entropy weight method is used to calculate the weight of the evaluation members. The evaluation information of the evaluation personnel on the failure mode is aggregated based on the weight of the evaluation members. Then, the K-means clustering algorithm is used to calculate the distance between failure modes and each cluster center point by using the normalized weight of influencing factors and the evaluation distance of each evaluator. Finally, the evaluation of an electromagnet failure mode is taken as an example to prove the objectivity and practicability of the new method.
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a systematic activity in the stage of product design and process design. However, the traditional FMEA has some shortcomings in practical application, such as too many evaluation languages, uncertain weights of influencing factors, and uncertain weights of evaluation members. This paper presents an FMEA evaluation method in manufacturing system based on similarity measure, nonlinear programming model, and intuitionistic fuzzy number (IFN). Firstly, the IFN is used to evaluate failure mode, which overcomes the defect of traditional FMEA evaluation value. Secondly, the weight of failure evaluation team members is solved according to the concept of similarity measure to make up for the blank of evaluation members’ weight aiming at the shortage of unknown weight. Then, the definition of consensus measure is introduced to make the evaluators reach a consensus, and the weights of influencing factors of failure modes (FMs) are calculated. Finally, the weights of evaluators and influencing factors are calculated by IFN algorithm and score function, and the score value of each FM is obtained to rank instead of risk priority number (RPN). The objectivity and practicability of the new method are verified by the example of failure mode for an attractive electromagnet manufacturing system.
Because an electromagnet has a complex structure and manufacturing process, it is difficult to analyze the overall failure of the electromagnet. In order to solve this problem, a fault intelligent analysis and diagnosis system based on fuzzy fault tree and evidence theory is proposed in this paper. First, the failure structure and fuzzy fault tree are generated according to the experience. Second, the probability of failure caused by basic events is obtained based on the data statistics of the insufficient holding force of the electromagnet in the past. Then, the probability of the basic events is given by using the synthesis rules of evidence theory. Next, the belief interval of the basic event is set as the fuzzy number, and the intelligent analysis is completed by using the calculated fuzzy importance. Finally, the validity and feasibility of the proposed method is proved by using the failure of insufficient retention force in the electromagnet manufacturing process as an example.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.