Purpose In current studies, the role of serum Cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 in CRC. Patients and Methods Data were collected for 196 stage I–III CRC patients and 50 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients between January 2018 and December 2019. The serum CYFRA 21-1 levels were measured using the chemiluminescent particle immunoassay (CMIA) kit in all objects and common biomarkers such as CA19-9, CEA, HSP90α, and AFP were measured in all colorectal cancer patients. We investigated the association between CYFRA 21-1 level and clinicopathological features. In addition, we evaluated the ability of serum CRFRA21-1 to differentiate CRLM from CRC. To assess the potential prognostic value, we used Cox proportional hazard model for univariate or multivariate analyses. Results Serum CYFRA 21-1 was significantly elevated in CRLM patients compared to stage I–III CRC patients (5.85 ng/mL vs 2.29 ng/mL, p < 0.001). For all CRC patients cohort, stage I–III CRC patients cohort and CRLM patients cohort, the optimal cutoff levels of CYFRA 21-1 for overall survival (OS) were 3.47 ng/mL, 2.14 ng/mL and 7.63 ng/mL, respectively, and the optimal cutoff levels for progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.47 ng/mL, 2.56 ng/mL and 7.63 ng/mL, respectively. For CRLM patients, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with high CYFRA 21-1 level had poor OS. Multivariate analysis indicated that the CYFRA 21-1 level was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in stage I–III patients. And CYFRA 21-1 levels and age were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS in CRLM patients. Conclusion CYFRA 21-1 can better differentiate CRLM patients from the whole CRC patients and has unique prognostic value for CRLM patients.

No abstract

Purpose: eHSP90α is closely related to tumor progression and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the significance of eHSP90α in the response evaluation and prediction of small cell lung cancer.Methods: We analyzed the relationship between eHSP90α expression and clinicopathological features in 105 patients with small cell lung cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association of parameters and ratios with response assessment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Results: In SCLC patients, eHSP90α and NSE were positively correlated. The cutoff values of eHSP90α in OS, PFS, and response evaluation were 61.2 ng/ml, 48.7 ng/ml, and 48.7 ng/ml, respectively. eHSP90α could better predict OS, PFS, and response evaluation (AUC OS 0.791, PFS 0.662, 0.685). Radiotherapy and eHSP90α were independent variables for effective chemotherapy through univariate and multivariate analysis. In contrast, radiotherapy, eHSP90α, NSE, and M stage were independent variables for OS. eHSP90α, and M stage were independent variables for PFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that higher eHSP90α expression predicted poorer OS and earlier progression in patients.Conclusions: This study aims to provide new evidence for the efficacy response and prognostic assessment of SCLC. eHSP90α may be a better biomarker for SCLC.