Maize is a major crop and a model plant for studying C4 photosynthesis and leaf development. However, a genomewide regulatory network of leaf development is not yet available. This knowledge is useful for developing C3 crops to perform C4 photosynthesis for enhanced yields. Here, using 22 transcriptomes of developing maize leaves from dry seeds to 192 h post imbibition, we studied gene up-and down-regulation and functional transition during leaf development and inferred sets of strongly coexpressed genes. More significantly, we developed a method to predict transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) and their cognate transcription factors (TFs) using genomic sequence and transcriptomic data. The method requires not only evolutionary conservation of candidate TFBSs and sets of strongly coexpressed genes but also that the genes in a gene set share the same Gene Ontology term so that they are involved in the same biological function. In addition, we developed another method to predict maize TF-TFBS pairs using known TF-TFBS pairs in Arabidopsis or rice. From these efforts, we predicted 1,340 novel TFBSs and 253 new TF-TFBS pairs in the maize genome, far exceeding the 30 TF-TFBS pairs currently known in maize. In most cases studied by both methods, the two methods gave similar predictions. In vitro tests of 12 predicted TF-TFBS interactions showed that our methods perform well. Our study has significantly expanded our knowledge on the regulatory network involved in maize leaf development. maize transcriptomes | coexpressed genes | cis binding site M aize (Zea mays) is a major crop and a model plant for studying C4 photosynthesis and leaf development. However, the regulatory network that controls maize leaf development is still not well understood. In fact, the number of known maize transcription factor (TF)-binding sites (TFBSs) is far smaller than that for Arabidopsis thaliana (1-3).To understand better the regulation of maize leaf development, several recent studies used next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies to survey transcriptomic differences among maize leaf cell types and developmental stages. The first large-scale study was by Li et al. (7) investigated the transcriptomes of Kranz (i.e., the foliar leaf blade) and non-Kranz (the husk leaf sheath) maize leaves to identify cohorts of genes associated with procambium initiation and vascular patterning. Recently, Wang et al. (8) conducted comparative transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of developing leaves in maize and rice and identified putative structural and regulatory components important for C4 and C3 photosynthesis. These studies provided insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying the development of Kranz leaf anatomy in maize.In the present study, we obtained nine transcriptomes of the second leaf from 84-192 h post imbibition at 12-h (6:00 AM and 6:00 PM) or 24-h (6:00 PM only) intervals. Together with the 13 SignificanceMaize is a major crop and a model plant for studying C4 leaf development. However, its regulatory network of leaf ...

The origin of nitrogen fixation is an important issue in evolutionary biology. While nitrogen is required by all living organisms, only a small fraction of bacteria and archaea can fix nitrogen. The prevailing view is that nitrogen fixation first evolved in archaea and was later transferred to bacteria. However, nitrogen-fixing bacteria are far larger in number and far more diverse in ecological niches than nitrogen-fixing archaea. We therefore propose the bacteria-first hypothesis, which postulates that nitrogen fixation first evolved in bacteria and was later transferred to archaea. As >30,000 prokaryotic genomes have been sequenced, we conduct an in-depth comparison of the two hypotheses. We first identify the six genes involved in nitrogen fixation in all sequenced prokaryotic genomes and then reconstruct phylogenetic trees using the six nitrogen-fixing (Nif) proteins individually or in combination. In each of these trees the earliest lineages are bacterial Nif protein sequences and in the oldest clade (group) the archaeal sequences are all nested inside bacterial sequences, suggesting that the Nif proteins first evolved in bacteria. The bacteria-first hypothesis is further supported by the observation that the majority of nitrogen-fixing archaea carry the major bacterial Mo (molybdenum) transporter (ModABC) rather than the archaeal Mo transporter (WtpABC). Moreover, in our phylogeny of all available ModA and WtpA protein sequences the earliest lineages are bacterial sequences while archaeal sequences are nested inside bacterial sequences. Furthermore, the bacteria-first hypothesis is supported by available isotopic data. In conclusion, our study strongly supports the bacteria-first hypothesis.