To understand the origin of chemical remagnetization in carbonate reservoir rocks and associated chemical processes, we have conducted detailed petrologic, geochemical, and magnetic studies of the hydrocarbon‐impregnated Ediacaran dolomite in the Taishan Paleo‐reservoir, south China. Samples were collected across a continuous outcrop consisting of oil‐free dolomite, transition zone dolomite, and highly hydrocarbon‐impregnated reservoir dolomite. Paleomagnetic results show that dolomite from the reservoir and transition zone were remagnetized and carries a possible Cambrian‐Ordovician direction (Dec = 163.7°, Inc = 10.6°, and α95 = 1.9°), and the oil‐free dolomite shows unstable magnetizations. Hematite is the magnetic mineral in the oil‐free dolomite, whereas the hydrocarbon‐impregnated reservoir dolomite contains no hematite but mainly pyrrhotite nanoparticles. Transition‐zone dolomite contains both hematite and pyrrhotite. In addition, the natural remanent magnetization intensities decrease from the reservoir dolomite, through the transition zone, and into the oil‐free dolomite, and a similar trend was observed in the total organic carbon and bitumen contents. The results suggest that the magnetic mineral assemblage and magnetic intensity in dolomite appear to be closely related to the degree of hydrocarbon impregnation and that remagnetization of the Ediacaran dolomite was likely caused by hydrocarbon migration into the dolomite. Pyrrhotite nanoparticles, magnetite, and barite are suggested to be formed during hydrocarbon migration, by the reduction of detrital hematite in the dolomite and sulfur species in the hydrocarbons. The new findings into the origin of pervasive remagnetization have the potential to guide future hydrocarbon exploration within Ediacaran dolomite that is host to the largest single carbonate gas reservoir in China.

As concerns rise over damaging earthquakes related to industrial activities such as hydraulic fracturing, geothermal energy extraction and wastewater disposal, it is essential to understand how subsurface fluid injection triggers seismicity even in distant regions where pore pressure diffusion cannot reach. Previous studies suggested long-range poroelastic stressing and aseismic slip as potential triggering mechanisms. In this study, we show that significant stress transfer originating from injection-induced aseismic slip can travel at much higher speeds and is a viable mechanism for distant earthquake triggering. It could also explain microseismicity migration that is much faster than aseismic slip front propagation. We demonstrate the application of these concepts with seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing operations in Weiyuan Shale Gas Field, China. The speed of stress transfer is dependent on the background stress level and injection rate, and can be almost an order of magnitude higher than that of the aseismic slip front.

No abstract

No abstract