RESCUE BT Trial Investigators E ndovascular treatment has been shown to significantly increase the reperfusion rate and improve the functional outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. [1][2][3][4] However, endovascular thrombectomy has historically failed to yield successful reperfusion in approximately 30% of patients. 5 Unsuccessful reperfusion likely arises in part from mechanical thrombectomy devices causing traumatic damage to the vascular endothelium with subendothelial matrix exposure, leading to platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation and potentially resulting in reocclusion and thromboembolic complications. 6,7 Tirofiban, a highly selective nonpeptide platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with a relatively short half-life that can reversibly prevent platelet aggregation, has been proven to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. [8][9][10] Given the benefit of treatment of acute coronary syndromes, a growing number of studies have evaluated tirofiban as an adjunctive treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke IMPORTANCE Tirofiban is a highly selective nonpeptide antagonist of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation. It remains uncertain whether intravenous tirofiban is effective to improve functional outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and adverse events of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was implemented at 55 hospitals in China, enrolling 948 patients with stroke and proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intravenous tirofiban improves functional outcomes without promoting the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke secondary to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) receiving endovascular thrombectomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with acute BAO stroke who were treated with endovascular thrombectomy and had tirofiban treatment information were derived from “BASILAR”: a nationwide, prospective registry. All eligible patients were divided into tirofiban and no-tirofiban groups according to whether tirofiban was used intravenously. The primary endpoint was the 90-day severity of disability as assessed by the modified Rankin scale score. Safety outcomes were the frequency of ICH and mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 645 patients included in this cohort, 363 were in the tirofiban group and 282 were in the no-tirofiban group. Thrombectomy with intravenous tirofiban reduced the 90-day disability level over the range of the modified Rankin scale (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45–2.97; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The 90-day mortality of patients in the tirofiban group was lower than that in the no-tirofiban group (41.6% vs. 52.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47–0.77; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The frequency of any ICH (6.7% vs. 13.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and symptomatic ICH (4.8% vs. 10.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.01) in the tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in the no-tirofiban group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with acute BAO stroke who underwent endovascular treatment, intravenous tirofiban might be associated with favorable outcome, reduced mortality, and a decreased frequency of ICH.

IntroductionAccording to the literature on anterior circulation, comorbid atrial fibrillation (AF) is not associated with a worse functional outcome, lower reperfusion rates, or higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or treatment with supportive care. However, data are limited for the effect of comorbid AF on procedural and clinical outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) after MT. This study aimed to investigate the effect of atrial fibrillation on outcomes after MT and long-term ischemic recurrence in patients with ABAO.MethodsWe performed a registered study of the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR, which is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR1800014759) from January 2014 to May 2019, which included 647 patients who underwent MT for ABAO, 136 of whom had comorbid AF. Prospectively defined baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and clinical outcomes were reported and compared.ResultsOn multivariate analysis, AF predicted a shorter puncture-to-recanalization time, higher first-pass effect rate, and lower incidence of angioplasty and/or stenting (p &lt; 0.01). AF had no effect on intracranial hemorrhage incidence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.093; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.451–2.652], 90-day functional outcomes (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.588–1.424), or mortality (aOR, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.491–1.475) after MT. The main findings were robust in the subgroup and 1-year follow-up analyses. Comorbid AF was the remaining predictor of ischemic recurrence (aOR, 4.076; 95% CI, 1.137–14.612).ConclusionsThe study revealed no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of MT for ABAO regardless of whether patients had comorbid AF. However, a higher proportion of patients with AF experienced ischemic recurrence within 1 year after MT.

Introduction This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in young patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) receiving endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods Consecutive patients with BAO within 24 h who underwent EVT from the BASILAR Registry study were enrolled. We compared clinical outcomes of young patients (aged 18–55 years) with older patients (aged > 55 years) with stroke due to BAO at 90 days and 1 year after EVT. The primary and secondary outcomes were improvement in modified Rankin scale scores (mRS) at 90 days and either favorable (mRS 0–3) or mortality at 90 days, respectively. Results A total of 646 patients were included, of which 152 (23.53%) were aged 18–55 years. Dyslipidemia (42.11% vs. 30.36%, p = 0.007) and good collateral circulation (60.52% vs. 46.35%, p = 0.002) were more frequent in young patients than older. Stroke etiologies in young patients included large artery atherosclerosis (67.11%), cardioembolism (15.13%), and vessel dissection (5.26%). Young patients were associated with better prognosis (mRS: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–2.48; mRS 0–3: aOR 1.60; 95% CI 1.01–2.54; mortality: aOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.38–0.93) at 90 days. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS), and sex were independent predictors of clinical outcomes of young patients at 90 days after EVT. Conclusion Young patients with BAO had better clinical outcomes after EVT than old patients. Predictors of clinical outcomes in young patients undergoing EVT included baseline NIHSS score, pc-ASPECTS, and sex. Trial Registration Clinical Trial Registration-URL: ChiCTR180001475 ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00372-6.