SummaryThe distribution of essential metal ions over subcellular compartments for use as cofactors requires control of membrane transporters. PAA2/HMA8 is a copper-transporting P 1B -type ATPase in the thylakoid membrane, required for the maturation of plastocyanin. When copper is highly available to the plant this transporter is degraded, which implies the action of a protease.In order to identify the proteolytic machinery responsible for PAA2/HMA8 turnover in Arabidopsis, mutant lines defective in five different chloroplast protease systems were analyzed.Plants defective in the chloroplast caseinolytic protease (Clp) system were specifically impaired in PAA2/HMA8 protein turnover on media containing elevated copper concentrations. However, the abundance of a core Clp component was not directly affected by copper. Furthermore, the expression and activity of both cytosolic and chloroplast-localized superoxide dismutases (SODs), which are known to be dependent on copper, were not altered in the clp mutants, indicating that the loss of PAA2/HMA8 turnover in these lines was not caused by a lack of stromal copper.The results suggest that copper excess in the stroma triggers selection of the thylakoidlocalized PAA2 transporter for degradation by the Clp protease, but not several other chloroplast proteases, and support a novel role for this proteolytic system in cellular copper homeostasis.

A network of peptidases governs proteostasis in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria. This study reveals strong genetic and functional interactions in Arabidopsis between the chloroplast stromal CLP chaperone-protease system and the PREP1,2 peptidases, which are dually localized to chloroplast stroma and the mitochondrial matrix.Higher order mutants defective in CLP or PREP proteins were generated and analyzed by quantitative proteomics and N-terminal proteomics (terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates (TAILS)).Strong synergistic interactions were observed between the CLP protease system (clpr1-2, clpr2-1, clpc1-1, clpt1, clpt2) and both PREP homologs (prep1, prep2) resulting in embryo lethality or growth and developmental phenotypes. Synergistic interactions were observed even when only one of the PREP proteins was lacking, suggesting that PREP1 and PREP2 have divergent substrates. Proteome phenotypes were driven by the loss of CLP protease capacity, with little impact from the PREP peptidases. Chloroplast N-terminal proteomes showed that many nuclear encoded chloroplast proteins have alternatively processed N-termini in pre-p1prep2, clpt1clpt2 and prep1prep2clpt1clpt2.Loss of chloroplast protease capacity interferes with stromal processing peptidase (SPP) activity due to folding stress and low levels of accumulated cleaved cTP fragments. PREP1,2 proteolysis of cleaved cTPs is complemented by unknown proteases. A model for CLP and PREP activity within a hierarchical chloroplast proteolysis network is proposed.

The essential chloroplast CLP protease system consists of a tetradecameric proteolytic core with catalytic P (P1, 3–6) and non‐catalytic R (R1–4) subunits, CLP chaperones and adaptors. The chloroplast CLP complex has a total of ten catalytic sites,but it is not known how many of these catalytic sites can be inactivated before plants lose viability. Here we show that CLPP3 and the catalytically inactive variant CLPP3S164A fully complement the developmental arrest of the clpp3‐1 null mutant, even under environmental stress. In contrast, whereas the inactive variant CLPP5S193A assembled into the CLP core, it cannot rescue the embryo lethal phenotype of the clpp5‐1 null mutant. This shows that CLPP3 makes a unique structural contribution but its catalytic site is dispensable, whereas the catalytic activity of CLPP5 is essential. Mass spectrometry of affinity‐purified CLP cores of the complemented lines showed highly enriched CLP cores. Other chloroplast proteins were co‐purified with the CLP cores and are candidate substrates. A strong overlap of co‐purified proteins between the CLP core complexes with active and inactive subunits indicates that CLP cores with reduced number of catalytic sites do not over‐accumulate substrates, suggesting that the bottle‐neck for degradation is likely substrate recognition and unfolding by CLP adaptors and chaperones, upstream of the CLP core.