Background: People with intellectual disabilities are a particularly vulnerable group, at an increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 and of poor mental health. Psychologists providing mental health support to people with intellectual disabilities report poorer mental wellbeing and higher occupational stress. Moreover, they raise concerns about the ability of people with intellectual disabilities to engage with digital technologies for mental health support in the context of reduced face-to-face psychological provision.Aims: The study aimed to understand psychologists' experiences of working with people with intellectual disabilities during the pandemic.Materials & Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 psychologists from community intellectual disabilities services. Data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.Results: Two superordinate themes emerged. Survive or Thrive highlighted the challenges and successes clinical psychologists experienced while working during the pandemic. 'Left to Their Own Devices' described psychologists' experiences of their clients as forgotten within society. Conclusion:The current study demonstrates psychologists' ability to adapt to extremely challenging circumstances, exposes the vulnerabilities of people with intellectual disabilities and highlights the gaps in service provision.

There is overwhelming evidence that the outcome for people with schizophrenia in Western industrialised countries is inferior to that of those living in the Third World. Extended family structures, greater opportunities for social reintegration, and more positive constructions of mental illness have been offered as possible explanations for this effect. The Asian community in the UK retains many of these features as well as strong links with native cultures of origin. The issue arises as to whether similar differences in outcome may be observed in the UK. An exploratory study was undertaken, examining the early progress of schizophrenia in a first-episode sample (n = 137), and based on systematic examination of case-note data. A lower rate of relapse/readmission in the first 12 months after discharge was found in the Asian (16%) as compared with white (30%) and Afro-Caribbean (49%) patients. Available evidence suggested that speed of access to care, living with a family, and employment may account for this effect. Medication compliance may have contributed to differences in relapse between white and Afro-Caribbeans but was not a factor influencing the low rate among Asians. The limitations and strengths of case-note studies are discussed at length, and it is concluded that a prospective study is warranted and would be highly instructive.

Support for professional footballers' mental wellbeing requires improvement. Recommendations are made for future research, mental health education and support.

No abstract