The aim of the present study was to characterize cells involved in resorption during endochondral bone formation. We investigated whether the cells involved in cartilage breakdown at the epiphyseal/metaphyseal border, i.e., chondroclasts, share the characteristics of bone/cartilage-resorbing osteoclasts at the metaphyseal/diaphyseal border regarding ultrastructural features and functional activity. Morphometric evaluation showed that chondroclasts do not form ruffled borders and clear zones, i.e., well-known resorption characteristics, to the same extent as osteoclasts, present at the lower metaphysis. Instead, chondroclasts tend to express an undifferentiated surface adjacent to the matrix, not structurally different from the basolateral plasma membrane. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) was used as a marker for functional activity. Immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy was strong in both chondroclasts and in osteoclasts. Furthermore, in situ hybridization revealed large amounts of TRAP mRNA in chondroclasts as well as in osteoclasts. Ultrastructural immunohistochemistry suggests extensive secretion of the TRAP enzyme in the ruffled border area of both chondroclasts and osteoclasts. Intracellular accumulation was seen particularly in chondroclasts, possibly as a consequence of a relative disinclination to develop a ruffled border. Thus, semiquantitative estimation of TRAP distribution showed an inverse relationship between extracellular and intracellular TRAP in chondroclasts and osteoclasts. These results indicate that chondroclasts and osteoclasts differ, not only with respect to location but possibly also by mode of action. The observed differences may reflect the maturation sequence of these multinucleated cells when associated with different metaphyseal trabecular surfaces.

Fibronectin is a well known glycoprotein of extracellular connective tissue matrices due to a specific amino acid-sequence (RGD) suggested to act as an attachment factor in cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions. Although also present in bone, little is known about the role of fibronectin in this tissue. To obtain data for discussions on function we used ultrastructural immunolocalization techniques to quantitatively examine the distribution of fibronectin in various bone matrix compartments. The study was focused on three different stages of endochondral ossification in growing long bones of young rats. The results show large amounts of fibronectin in mature bone tissue. At a higher magnification, an obvious fibronectin association to individual fibrils of collagen type I was demonstrated. Intracellular labeling was observed in Golgi-related vesicles in some active osteoblasts of metaphyseal bone, indicating local synthesis of fibronectin. In contrast to previous suggestions based on light microscopic observations, the labeling of bone or cartilage matrices facing the surface of all cell types were low. The pattern is clearly different from that of osteopontin and bone sialoprotein, two other bone matrix proteins with the same cell-binding sequence. Our results indicate that fibronectin at these stages of development participates in matrix organization rather than being an important link between cartilage or bone matrix and adjacent cells.

The activation sequence of clasts (the designation clast was used because ultrastructurally in this tissue, it is not always possible to differentiate between chondroclasts sitting on cartilage and osteoclasts sitting on bone matrix) was studied in vivo using the healing of low-phosphate, vitamin D-deficiency rickets as a model system. Thus, the bones of 7-week-old rachitic animals were analyzed with a combination of morphological, biochemical, and molecular biological methods at 48 and 72 h, respectively, after change to normal food. A quantitative ultrastructural analysis showed that the number of clast profiles exhibiting the characteristic polarized features of actively resorbing cells, i.e., ruffled borders and clear zones, had reached normal levels after 48 h. By combining the data with quantitative analyses by the immunogold technique, we demonstrated that cathepsin K secretion was coupled to ruffled border formation in clasts irrespective of whether the number of polarized clasts was low (in rickets) or high (in healing). In contrast, the levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) both between ruffles and in the outside matrix adjoining the ruffled border were low in polarized clasts both in rickets and at the early (48 h) healing time-point, but were increased at the latest (72 h) healing time-point. Interestingly, expression of TRAP and the cathepsin K at the mRNA level, as well as protein expression and the activity of TRAP, were not different during the healing sequence. Although the two enzymes are confined to the same clast populations, their secretion during the resorption process is apparently differentially regulated: cathepsin K secretion is coupled to ruffled border formation in clasts, whereas TRAP is secreted at a later stage during the resorption sequence, suggesting a role for secreted TRAP as a modulator of resorptive activity.

Focusing on resorption processes, we have extended our previous studies on chondroclasts and osteoclasts in normally developing tissues, using a model of nutritionally induced vitamin D-deficiency rickets. To analyze the resorption process, we investigated the matrix-resorbing cells in this modified and poorly mineralized tissue regarding morphological features and expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) at the subcellular level. Our goal was to test the hypotheses that initiation of resorption is impaired with unmineralized matrix, and that such alterations involve changes in the subcellullar distribution of TRAP, implicating a role for this enzyme in the resorption process. Our results reveal distinctly different morphological appearances of clast-like cells in rickets compared with normal osteoclasts and chondroclasts. Ordinary resorption structures of osteoclasts and chondroclasts at the cell-matrix border, i.e., ruffled borders and clear zones, are profoundly altered in favor of a less well-defined intermediate zone. TRAP distribution at the subcellullar level is also clearly different from that in osteoclasts and chondroclasts from normal rodents, with impaired secretion; consequently, the enzyme is unable to function in the matrix outside the ruffled border. Our ultrastructural observations demonstrate that in rickets, the clasts are incapable of degrading the poorly mineralized cartilage and bone efficiently. Rachitic clasts seem to be recruited to the matrix surface and interaction between cell and matrix is also initiated, but definitive resorption structures at the cell-matrix border are not normally developed. Whether resorption is inhibited by the mere lack of mineral or mineral-associated proteins, or by other mechanisms remains to be settled.