Mammalian cell lines are characterized by a complex and flexible metabolism. A single model that could describe the variations in metabolic behavior triggered by variations in the culture conditions would be a precious tool in bioprocess development. In this paper, we introduce an approach to generate a poly-pathway model and use it to simulate diverse metabolic states triggered in response to removal, reduction or doubling of amino acids in the culture medium of an antibody-producing CHO cell line. Macro-reactions were obtained from a metabolic network via elementary flux mode enumeration and the fluxes were modeled by kinetic equations with saturation and inhibition effects from external medium components. Importantly, one set of kinetic parameters was estimated using experimental data of the multiple metabolic states. A good fit between the model and the data was obtained for the majority of the metabolites and the experimentally observed flux variations. We find that the poly-pathway modeling approach is promising for the simulation of multiple metabolic states.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). The authors of the paper wish to retract the paper due to the discovery of a calculation error in the processing of the raw data. The discovered error concerns the calculation of the specific uptake/secretion rates for several metabolites in one of the experimental conditions, i.e. glutamine omission (called Q0). In other words, in Figure 2, the variations of the metabolic fluxes for the condition Q0 are not correct. When this error is corrected, the resulting mathematical model changes (in particular for the results associated with Q0 conditions), several figures and tables are modified, and the interpretation of the fluxes in Q0 has to be slightly modified. Therefore the authors wish to retract the article. However, the error does not affect the modelling approach or the methodology presented in the article. Therefore, a revised version with the correct data has since been published: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165617302663. We apologize to the scientific community for the need to retract the article and the inconvenience caused.

No abstract