This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2009.Contributed by V. Craig Jordan, September 14, 2011 (sent for review June 21, 2011) In laboratory studies, acquired resistance to long-term antihormonal therapy in breast cancer evolves through two phases over 5 y. Phase I develops within 1 y, and tumor growth occurs with either 17β-estradiol (E 2 ) or tamoxifen. Phase II resistance develops after 5 y of therapy, and tamoxifen still stimulates growth; however, E 2 paradoxically induces apoptosis. This finding is the basis for the clinical use of estrogen to treat advanced antihormone-resistant breast cancer. We interrogated E 2 -induced apoptosis by analysis of gene expression across time (2-96 h) in MCF-7 cell variants that were estrogen-dependent (WS8) or resistant to estrogen deprivation and refractory (2A) or sensitive (5C) to E 2 -induced apoptosis. We developed a method termed differential area under the curve analysis that identified genes uniquely regulated by E 2 in 5C cells compared with both WS8 and 2A cells and hence, were associated with E 2 -induced apoptosis. Estrogen signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), and inflammatory response genes were overrepresented among the 5C-specific genes. The identified ERS genes indicated that E 2 inhibited protein folding, translation, and fatty acid synthesis. Meanwhile, the ERS-associated apoptotic genes Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM; BCL2L11) and caspase-4 (CASP4), among others, were induced. Evaluation of a caspase peptide inhibitor panel showed that the CASP4 inhibitor z-LEVD-fmk was the most active at blocking E 2 -induced apoptosis. Furthermore, z-LEVD-fmk completely prevented poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, E 2 -inhibited growth, and apoptotic morphology. The up-regulated proinflammatory genes included IL, IFN, and arachidonic acid-related genes. Functional testing showed that arachidonic acid and E 2 interacted to superadditively induce apoptosis. Therefore, these data indicate that E 2 induced apoptosis through ERS and inflammatory responses in advanced antihormone-resistant breast cancer.aromatase inhibitor | antihormonal resistance | estrogen receptor | gene expression microarrays | selective estrogen receptor modulator E lucidation of the basic structure function relationships of synthetic estrogens based on either stilbene (1) or triphenylethylene (2) was a landmark achievement that continues to have major therapeutic implications to this day. The first successful chemical therapy for the treatment of any cancer was the use of high-dose synthetic estrogen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (3). Response rates for patients who were more than a decade beyond menopause were about 30%. Importantly, treatment near menopause was ineffective, and therefore, tumor responsiveness was related to the duration of estrogen deprivation. In 1970, Alexander Haddow commented that "the extraordinary extent of tumor regression observed in...

The link between estrogen and the development and proliferation of breast cancer is well documented. Estrogen stimulates growth and inhibits apoptosis through estrogen receptor-mediated mechanisms in many cell types. Interestingly, there is strong evidence that estrogen induces apoptosis in breast cancer and other cell types. Forty years ago, before the development of tamoxifen, high-dose estrogen was used to induce tumor regression of hormone-dependent breast cancer in post-menopausal women. While the mechanisms by which estrogen induces apoptosis were not completely known, recent evidence from our laboratory and others demonstrates the involvement of the extrinsic (Fas/FasL) and the intrinsic (mitochondria) pathways in this process. We discuss the different apoptotic signaling pathways involved in E2 (17β-estradiol)-induced apoptosis, including the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, the NF-κB (nuclear factor-kappa-B)-mediated survival pathway as well as the PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase)/Akt signaling pathway. Breast cancer cells can also be sensitized to estrogen-induced apoptosis through suppression of glutathione by BSO (L-buthionine sulfoximine). This finding has implications for the control of breast cancer with lowdose estrogen and other targeted therapeutic drugs. IntroductionBreast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers among women, with an estimated 184,450 new cases of invasive disease and 40,930 deaths in 2008. There is strong evidence that estrogen plays a role in its development and progression [1]. Breast cancer was first recognized to be estrogen-dependent when the British surgeon George Beatson [2] published his findings of the beneficial effects of oophorectomy in a pre-menopausal patient with advanced breast cancer. Beatson had based his approach on the role of the ovaries in mammalian lactation and presumed that there would be a similar mechanism for breast cancer growth. Since that time, there has been an expanding clinical database that implicates estrogen in the development and progression of breast cancer. Evidence to support this conclusion comes from clinical studies of hormone replacement therapy, which were initially designed to determine the benefits of replacement approaches on post-menopausal women's health [3,4], and the successful clinical strategy of treating breast cancer by blocking estrogen action using the anti-estrogen tamoxifen [5] or preventing estrogen synthesis using aromatase inhibitors (AIs) [6].Estrogens are a class of sex steroid hormones that are synthesized from cholesterol and are secreted primarily by the ovaries, with secondary contributions from placenta, adipose tissue, testes, and adrenal glands. After menopause, ovarian estrogen biosynthesis is minimal, with circulating estrogens being derived principally from peripheral aromatization of adrenal androgens. Estrogens are essential to the function of the female reproductive system and are required for the proliferation and differentiation of healthy breast epithelium. Estro...

Endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are the standard treatment options for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, resistance to these agents has become a major clinical obstacle. Potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapies have been identified, often involving enhanced growth factor signaling and changes in the expression or action of the estrogen receptor, but few studies have addressed the role of noncoding RNA (ncRNA). Two important types of ncRNA include microRNA (miRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). miRNAs are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression via translational inhibition or degradation of mRNA transcripts, while lncRNAs are larger RNA molecules that have been shown to play a role in multiple cellular maintenance functions such as protein scaffolding, chromatin looping, and regulation of mRNA stability. Both miRNA and lncRNA have recently impacted the field of breast cancer research as important pieces in the mechanistic puzzle of the genes and pathways involved in breast cancer development and progression. This review serves as an overview of the roles of miRNA and lncRNA in breast cancer progression and the development of endocrine resistance. Ideally, future experiments in the field should include identification of ncRNAs that could be potential therapeutic targets in endocrine-resistant tumors, as well as ncRNA biomarkers that facilitate more tumor-specific treatment options for endocrine-resistant breast cancer patients.

Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that has been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. It has antitumor activity; however, its mechanism of action remains unclear. In the present study, we characterized the effects of BZA and several other SERMs on the proliferation of hormone-dependent MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells and hormone-independent MCF-7:5C and MCF-7:2A cells and examined its mechanism of action in these cells. We found that all of the SERMs inhibited the growth of MCF-7, T47D, and MCF-7:2A cells; however, only BZA and fulvestrant (FUL) inhibited the growth of hormone-independent MCF-7:5C cells. Cell cycle analysis revealed that BZA and FUL induced G 1 blockade in MCF-7:5C cells; however, BZA down-regulated cyclin D1, which was constitutively overexpressed in these cells, whereas FUL suppressed cyclin A. Further analysis revealed that small interfering RNA knockdown of cyclin D1 reduced the basal growth of MCF-7:5C cells, and it blocked the ability of BZA to induce G 1 arrest in these cells. BZA also down-regulated estrogen receptor-␣ (ER␣) protein by increasing its degradation and suppressing cyclin D1 promoter activity in MCF-7:5C cells. Finally, molecular modeling studies demonstrated that BZA bound to ER␣ in an orientation similar to raloxifene; however, a number of residues adopted different conformations in the induced-fit docking poses compared with the experimental structure of ER␣-raloxifene. Together, these findings indicate that BZA is distinct from other SERMs in its ability to inhibit hormone-independent breast cancer cell growth and to regulate ER␣ and cyclin D1 expression in resistant cells.