BackgroundNowadays, dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and inadequate capsular support are becoming a challenge for every ophthalmic surgeon. Explantation of dislocated IOL and iris claw IOL (ICIOL) are the techniques that have been used in our ophthalmic department. The aim of this study is to report our technique for retropupillar ICIOL.MethodsThis study is a retrospective case series. A total of 105 eyes with dislocated IOL from the patients at the Department of Ophthalmology in Santa Maria Hospital, a tertiary reference hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, from January 2012 until January 2016, had been analyzed. Of these 105 eyes, 66 eyes had dislocated one-piece IOL and 39 eyes had dislocated three-piece IOL. The latter underwent iris suture of the same IOL and were excluded from this study. The remaining 66 eyes with dislocated one-piece IOL underwent pars plana vitrectomy, that is, explantation of dislocated IOL through corneal incision and an implantation of retropupillary ICIOL. Operative data and postoperative outcomes included best corrected visual acuity, IOL position, intraocular pressure, pigment dispersion, clinical signs of endothelial cell loss, and anterior chamber depth.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 6–48 months). The mean preoperative best corrected visual acuity was 1.260±0.771 logMAR, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity was 0.352±0.400 logMAR units. Mean vision gain was 0.909 logMar units. The patients had the following complications: 1) retinal detachment was found in one patient, 2) corneal edema was found in three patients, 3) high intraocular pressure was observed in twelve patients, 4) subluxation of the IOL was observed in one patient, and 5) macular edema was found in three eyes.ConclusionThe results demonstrate that retropupillary ICIOL is an easy and effective method for the correction of aphakia in patients not receiving capsule support. The safety of this procedure must be interpreted in the context of a surgery usually indicated in complicated cases.

Purpose: The XEN gel stent is a minimally invasive surgical device aimed at creating a subconjunctival drainage of aqueous humor, thereby reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Being a novel device, doubts remain with regard to the efficacy and safety of its implantation in the early stage of new users. This paper illustrates the XEN implantation learning curve, assessed through several surgeons of different expertise. Methods: This was a retrospective study on the first 6 XEN implants performed by each of the 10 certified ophthalmic surgeons. Simultaneous cataract surgery was allowed (phaco-XEN). Primary outcomes were as follows: surgical time; intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications. Secondary outcomes were as follows: IOP; the number of topical drugs in use; the need for needling procedures. Outcome data were collected preoperatively and at postoperative days 1, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA 14.1 and SPSS. Results: Sixty patients were included (56.7% female patients). Mean age was 73 years (45 to 89). Mean preoperative IOP was 23.8±8.95 mm Hg. From the included patients, 29 (48.3%) were submitted to simple XEN implant and 31 (51.7%) to phaco-XEN. In both groups, mean surgical time decreased by 9 minutes throughout the 6-implant learning curve. Final IOP was 15±7.27 mm Hg in the stent group (−43% than baseline), and 14.92±3.32 mm Hg in the phaco-XEN group (−16% than baseline). On average, patients decreased 2 topical IOP-lowering drugs. Needling procedures were performed in 17 patients (28.3%). Conclusions: XEN gel stent was associated with a fast learning curve, by both experienced surgeons and novice residents. By the sixth implant, both groups had considerably decreased mean surgical time and complication rates.

Angle closure is usually associated with older patients, as it typically manifests in middle to later life, being associated with an age-related increased lens volume. However, angle closure can occur in any age group if there is an anatomical predisposition that promotes pupillary block or an anterior pulling of the iris. During an acute angle closure, patients generally experience ocular pain, headache, nausea, vomiting and conjunctival hyperaemia. These attacks can be misinterpreted as migraine, particularly if subacute or chronic and the demographic characteristics of the patient do not suggest a primary angle closure event. Diagnosing a headache as ocular related is of paramount importance, since there is an effective treatment. We report a case of a child with intermittent headache which revealed a subacute angle closure in both eyes.

The XEN gel stent is an ab-interno minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device that reduces intraocular pressure by creating a subconjunctival drainage pathway. XEN intents to provide a safer and less invasive mean of lowering intraocular pressure. As with any new device, there is still some lack of experience and knowledge concerning efficacy, technique, and complications. We report a novel surgical approach for early bleb failure after XEN implantation.