BACKGROUND: Intrapartum cardiotocography is widely used in highresource countries and remains at the center of fetal monitoring and the decision to intervene, but there is ample evidence of poor reliability in visual interpretation as well as limited accuracy in identifying fetal hypoxia. Combined monitoring of intrapartum cardiotocography and ST segment signals was developed to increase specificity, but analysis relies heavily on intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation and is therefore also affected by the previously referred problems. Computerized analysis was developed to overcome these limitations, aiding in the quantification of parameters that are difficult to evaluate visually, such as variability, integrating the complex guidelines of combined intrapartum cardiotocography and ST analysis, and using visual and sound alerts to prompt health care professionals to reevaluate features associated with fetal hypoxia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of introducing a central fetal monitoring system with computerized analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography and ST signals into the labor ward of a tertiary care university hospital in which all women are continuously monitored with intrapartum cardiotocography. The incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes and intervention rates was evaluated over time. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, yearly rates of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, instrumental vaginal delivery, overall cesarean delivery, and urgent cesarean delivery were obtained from the hospital's clinical databases. The rates occurring in the period from January 2001 to December 2003, before the introduction of the central monitoring system with computerized analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography and ST signals (Omniview-SisPorto), were compared with
Background: The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is a frequent dental surgery, interfering with patients’ quality of life. Ultrasonic surgery is an alternative to osteotomy with conventional rotary instruments. This study compares postoperative signals and symptoms after extracting impacted mandibular third molars using ultrasonic surgery or conventional rotary osteotomy. Methods: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Thirty patients were randomly divided into the test group (ultrasonic technique) and a control group (conventional rotatory technique). All surgeries were timed. Swelling parameters, trismus and paraesthesia were evaluated on the day of surgery and the third, fifth and seventh postoperative days. Intraoperative bleeding was evaluated during surgery. Postoperative pain was evaluated daily by the patient through a visual analogue scale and the number of ingested analgesics. Results: Pain, swelling and trismus present beneficial results with the ultrasonic technique but without statistical significance. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly lower with ultrasonic surgery (t(28) = 3.258; p = 0.003). Operating time was significantly higher in extractions involving osteotomy and cutting crown and roots either with the conventional technique (p = 0.020) or ultrasonic technique (p = 0.039). Regardless of the surgical difficulty, no statistically significant results were detected between techniques regarding the procedure duration. Conclusions: The beneficial postoperative signs and symptoms make ultrasonic surgery a favourable therapeutic option, especially when the integrity of noble anatomical structures is the most important risk factor. Further studies with larger samples are needed to support the use of piezosurgery as a valid option for impacted mandibular third molar extraction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.