Aims Worldwide observational studies are evidencing discordance between guidelines and real‐world practice regarding direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) doses. This systematic review summarizes and evaluate DOACs use in real‐world practice. Methods This review was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines searching PubMed (MEDLINE) and Medscape databases. Results Data from 75 studies showed that most of the patients treated with DOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation received doses in accordance to the guidelines. However, a significant number of patients received off‐label doses (25–50% in most of the studies evaluated). DOAC overdosing was associated with increased all‐cause mortality and worse bleeding events while underdosing was associated with increased cardiovascular hospitalization and, particularly for apixaban, with a nearly 5‐fold increased risk of stroke. Conclusion Patients prescribed with off‐label DOAC doses did not receive the full benefit of anticoagulation and presented an increased risk of stroke, bleeding and/or adverse effects.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper examines the choice between English lingua franca and Portuguese (a pluricentric language in research article publishing), a choice which presents both a challenge and an opportunity to authors operating within the semiperipheral space of Portuguese research communities. Data on articles from three disciplinary areas: Linguistics, Information Science and Library Science, and Pharmacology and Pharmacy, written in Portuguese and English, have been retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) covering a 20-year period (1998-2017). Figures show a rise in publications in the second decade (2008-2017) in both languages: the number of English papers is higher throughout, but the rise in the number of Portuguese papers is steeper over these latter years. Given the disparity in the number of Portuguese and English-language WoS-indexed journals, the rise in English is probably not due to individual authorial choices, but to the lack of indexed journals in Portuguese, as well as to the constraints of the publishing market. Language choice is embedded in symbolic places of knowledge construction-in the processes of voicing research claims, in the multilayered historical processes within disciplinary communities of practice, and in the marketization of research publishing. These issues may shape future ways of disseminating knowledge in a publishing arena that will continue to be globalized, though perhaps not so monolingual.

The kinetic profile of gentamicin in premature infants has been studied to enable the development of optimized dosage schedules for neonatal intensive-care units and to stress the relationship between the pharmacokinetic parameters and several demographic, developmental and clinical factors which might be associated with changes in gentamicin disposition. Sixty-eight newborn patients of 24- to 34-weeks gestational age and 600-3,100 g current weight in their first week of life, undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring of their gentamicin serum levels, were included in this retrospective analysis. Gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were determined through non-linear regression by using a single-compartment open model. By regression analysis the current weight (g) was shown to be the strongest co-variate, and both gentamicin clearance (L h(-1)) and volume of distribution (L) had to be normalized. Additionally, gentamicin clearance depended on gestational age with a cut-off at 30 weeks, which allowed the division of the overall population into two subsets (< 30 weeks and between 30-34 weeks of gestational age). The younger neonates (<30 weeks of gestational age) showed a lower gentamicin clearance (0.0288 vs 0.0340 L h(-1) kg(-1)), a slightly higher volume of distribution (0.464 vs 0.435 L kg(-1)), and a longer half-life (11.17 vs 8.88 h) compared with the older subgroup (30-34 weeks of gestational age). On the basis of the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained, we suggest loading doses of 3.7 and 3.5 mg kg(-1) for the two subgroups of neonates (<30 weeks and 30-34 weeks of gestational age), respectively. The appropriate maintenance doses in accordance with the characteristics of the patients should be 2.8 mgkg(-1)/24h and 2.6 mg kg(-1)/18 h for neonates < 30 weeks and between 30-34 weeks of gestational age, respectively. Finally, when compared with previous studies, the information obtained on the pharmacokinetics and determinants of the pharmacokinetic variability of gentamicin in neonates was shown to be consistent.