Between October 1982 and August 1987, 20 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent surgical release of a tethered spinal cord. The tethering was caused by a thick filum terminale in 6 patients. On MRI scans, the conus medullaris was at L4 in 2 patients, at L2 in 3 patients, and the filum terminale appeared thick in 1 patient. The spinal cord was tethered to an intradural lipoma correctly demonstrated by MRI in 6 patients. Increased epidural fat was misdiagnosed as an intradural lipoma in one patient and a lipomatous stalk was not identified in 2 other patients. Scar tissue resulting from repair of a meningocele had tethered the cord in the remaining 8 patients. On MRI scans, the conus medullaris was located between L3 and S3; in 5 of the patients, scar tissue was apparent on the MRI scan. This correlative study supports the use of MRI as the initial, and possibly the only, imaging modality when a tethered spinal cord is suspected. Improved or more recent MRI techniques will help demonstrate these anomalies better.
Between October 1982 and August 1987, 20 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent surgical release of a tethered spinal cord. The tethering was caused by a thick filum terminale in 6 patients. On MRI scans, the conus medullaris was at L4 in 2 patients, at L2 in 3 patients, and the filum terminale appeared thick in 1 patient. The spinal cord was tethered to an intradural lipoma correctly demonstrated by MRI in 6 patients. Increased epidural fat was misdiagnosed as an intradural lipoma in one patient and a lipomatous stalk was not identified in 2 other patients. Scar tissue resulting from repair of a meningocele had tethered the cord in the remaining 8 patients. On MRI scans, the conus medullaris was located between L3 and S3; in 5 of the patients, scar tissue was apparent on the MRI scan. This correlative study supports the use of MRI as the initial, and possibly the only, imaging modality when a tethered spinal cord is suspected. Improved or more recent MRI techniques will help demonstrate these anomalies better.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.