SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that causes COVID-19 disease (coronavirus disease 2019). The viral particle contains single-stranded RNA composed of approximately 30 thousand nucleotides, and has a diameter of 60-140 nm, which makes it one of the largest RNA viruses [1]. The virus spreads through droplets. The incubation period is 1-14 days (approx. 5-7 days from exposure to symptom appearance) [2]. Its presence may be detected in secretions from the nose, throat, blood, sputum, stool, and tears. The first reports mentioning infections with the virus came from Wuhan in China (November 2019) [3]. Symptoms of the infection include, first and foremost, cough and fever (Table I). The virus has a predilection for the re-* Guidelines of scientific societies and associations (including the Polish Ophthalmological Society) do not constitute binding laws and do not determine the only correct procedures; they are only an opinion of a group of experts from a given field. The opinion reflects the current state of knowledge based on available scientific research results. The guidelines do not exempt healthcare workers from personal liability with regard to making the correct decisions for individual patients. Personal responsibility for the used therapeutic methods rests with all individuals who practise medicine. It should be based on thorough knowledge and practical skills, while observing necessary safety measures with regard to oneself and the patient. Readers of this paper are obliged to make themselves familiar with current information on the presented treatments and pharmacotherapies with special attention paid to manufacturers' information on doses, time, and administration as well as side effects of the used drugs. The publishers and editors of the paper shall not be responsible for any damages that could in any way be connected to the contents of this paper.

The aim of this study was to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosed between 1986 and 2015. 333 patients with definite MS were divided into four subgroups according to the following diagnostic criteria: Group A) Poser (n = 145), Group B) McDonald 2000 (n = 66), Group C) McDonald 2005 (n = 62), and Group D) McDonald 2010 (n = 60). We investigated: 1) patient sex and age at diagnosis, 2) symptoms and number of relapses that prompted MS diagnosis, 3) time between first symptoms suggestive of MS and confirmed diagnosis, and 5) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at disease onset.The overall female-to-male ratio was 2.3:1, but in the subgroups it differed significantly (A -1.9; B -1.6; C -4.7; D -3.6). The mean age at diagnosis (in years) decreased from 39.6 ± 13.3 in Group A to 29.9 ± 9.3 in Group D, p < 0.001. Pyramidal signs remained the most common manifestation regardless of the diagnostic criteria, although an increased trend of visual dysfunction was observed (A -16%, B -14%, C -19%, D -23,3%; A vs D, p < 0.001). The number of relapses before diagnosis decreased from median 4.0 to 2.5 in Group A and Group D, p < 0.001. Time from the first symptom to diagnosis shortened from 88.9 ± 80.2 months (Group A) to 33.6 ± 68.2 months (Group D), p < 0.0001. Mean EDSS score at diagnosis also decreased: A -4.4 ± 2.3; B -3.1 ± 1.7; C -2.7 ± 1.3; D -2.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001.Our study indicates significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of MS diagnosed according to the changing criteria.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the reorganization of the health care system. A decline in health- and life-saving procedures has been reported in various medical specialties. However, data on ophthalmic emergencies during lockdowns is limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, case-control study of 2351 patients registered at the ophthalmic emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Poland during three national COVID-19 lockdowns (March/April 2020, November 2020, and March/April 2021) and corresponding months in 2019. Results: The total number of visits declined from a mean of 720/month in the non-COVID era to 304/month during COVID-19 lockdowns (p < 0.001). Ocular trauma incidence dropped significantly from 2019 (non-COVID months) to 2020/2021 (COVID group mean 201 vs. 97 patients monthly, respectively, p = 0.03). Of note, the percentage of foreign bodies removal was significantly higher during lockdowns than corresponding time in the non-COVID era. A downward trend for vitreous detachment and macular disorders cases was observed between COVID and non-COVID time. Uveitis and optic neuritis patients were seen more often during lockdowns (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0013, respectively). In contrast, the frequency of conjunctivitis and keratitis, potentially COVID-related problems, decreased significantly in COVID-19 time (mean 138 vs. 23 per month in non-COVID vs. COVID lockdowns, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The overall number of eye emergency visits declined during COVID-19 lockdowns. Conjunctivitis and keratitis rates dropped during the lockdowns. Interestingly, the frequency of immune-mediated ocular conditions (uveitis, optic neuritis) increased significantly which might be triggered by SARS-CoV2 infection.

Background: Corneal infections with antibiotic-resistant microorganisms are an increasingly difficult management challenge and chemically or photochemically cross-linking the cornea for therapy presents a unique approach to managing such infections since both direct microbial pathogens killing and matrix stabilization can occur simultaneously. The present study was undertaken in order to compare the anti-microbial efficacy, in vitro, of 5 candidate cross-linking solutions against 5 different microbial pathogens with relevance to infectious keratitis. Methods: In vitro bactericidal efficacy studies were carried out using 5 different FARs [diazolidinyl urea (DAU), 1,3bis(hydroxymethyl)-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (DMDM), sodium hydroxymethylglycinate (SMG), 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol (NT = nitrotriol), 2-nitro-1-propanol (NP)] against 5 different microbial pathogens including two antibiotic-resistant species [methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Candida albicans (CA)]. Standard in vitro antimicrobial testing methods were used. Results: The results for MSSA were similar to those for MRSA. DAU, DMDM, and SMG all showed effectiveness with greater effects generally observed with longer incubation times and higher concentrations. Against MRSA, 40 mM SMG at 120 min showed a > 95% kill rate, p < 0.02. Against VRE, 40 mM DAU for 120 min showed a > 94% kill rate, p < 0.001. All FARs showed bactericidal effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, making PA the most susceptible of the strains tested. Candida showed relative resistance to these compounds, requiring high concentrations (100 mM) to achieve kill rates greater than 50%. Conclusion: Our results show that each FAR compound has different effects against different cultures. Our antimicrobial armamentarium could potentially be broadened by DAU, DMDM, SMG and other FARs for antibioticresistant keratitis. Further testing in live animal models are indicated.

Aim of the study:To compare the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) analysed based on the age at which they were diagnosed.Clinical rationale for the study: Most cases of MS are diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 40 years, but the clinical characteristics of patients with MS over this age range have rarely been studied. Material and methods: 182 patients diagnosed with MS between 2000 and 2015 were divided into four groups by age at diagnosis: < 30 years (n = 62), 30-39 years (n = 54), 40-49 years (n = 27), and ≥ 50 years (n = 39). The demographic, clinical and laboratory features of each age group were investigated and between-groups comparisons analysed.Results: There were no significant differences in the female-to-male ratio between groups, which was close to 3:1 in every group (p = 0.98). Motor symptoms were more common as the first manifestation of MS with increasing age (< 30: 19.3%; 30-39: 37.0%; 40-49: 44.4%; ≥ 50: 61.5%). Visual and sensory symptoms were responsible for nearly half of first manifestations in patients < 30 to 49, but affected a significantly lower proportion of patients in the oldest group (p = 0.01). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Expanded Disability Status Scale at diagnosis was higher with advancing age (2 [1.5-3], 2.25 [1.5-3.5], 3 [2-3.5], and 3.5 [3-5]; p < 0.01). There was also a higher proportion of patients with progressive forms of the disease with age, especially primary progressive MS (0.0%, 3.7%, 14.8%, and 51.3%; p < 0.01). The median (IQR) time needed to confirm the diagnosis of MS became significantly longer as age increased (7 [2-25], 9 [2-32], 12 [6-58], and 26 [12-60] months; p < 0.01). In laboratory tests, significant differences were found only in the rate of post-contrast enhancement by magnetic resonance imaging, which was lower in the older age groups (63.2%, 50.0%, 31.6%, and 30.0%; p < 0.01). Conclusions and clinical implications:Our study indicates significant differences in the demographic and clinical picture of MS depending on the age of the patient at diagnosis. Diagnostic delay in older patients is a common problem, and this study shows the features of later forms of MS to help inform neurologists and improve time to diagnosis.