The profession of occupational therapy claims to be patient centred; however, research shows that the views of patients and health care professionals often differ. Toileting is a fundamental daily activity, yet to date there have been few studies investigating the perceived importance of independence in toileting. A qualitative study was conducted to determine the views of stroke survivors and their occupational therapists regarding the importance of independence in toileting. A symbolic interactionistic framework was used, allowing the views of these two disparate groups to be compared. Thirteen stroke survivors and seven occupational therapists were interviewed. Five categories were identified in the data collected: the occupational form normally used in toileting; incontinence and continence; independence and dependence in toileting; issues relating to toileting and hospital discharge; and the role of occupational therapy. Both participant groups agreed that independence in toileting was important in avoiding the need for assistance and in avoiding feelings of decreased self-esteem. However, the patient participants' views extended further in that they stated that the method of toileting was important, not merely that it was conducted independently. In conclusion, it is essential that occupational therapists consider how they can facilitate a return to the method usually undertaken for toileting by patients. If a return to the previous methodology for toileting will not be possible, then the occupational therapists must give consideration as to how to facilitate adjustment by the patients.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract