The maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) is a daytime polysomnographic procedure which quantifies wake tendency by measuring the ability to remain awake during soporific circumstances. We present normative data based on 64 healthy subjects (27 males and 37 females) who adhered to uniform MWT procedural conditions including polysomnographic montage, illuminance level, seating position, room temperature, meal timing, and subject instructions. When allowed a maximum trial duration of 40 min, subjects' mean sleep latency to the first epoch of sustained sleep was 35.2 +/- 7.9 min. The lower normal limit, defined as two standard deviations below the mean, was 19.4 min. Calculation of data on the basis of a maximum trial duration of 20 min and sleep latency to the first appearance of brief sleep (a microsleep episode or one epoch of any stage of sleep) yielded a mean sleep latency of 18.1 +/- 3.6 min and a lower normal limit of 10.9 min. Sleep latency scores were significantly higher than those previously reported in patients with disorders of excessive somnolence. Therefore, the MWT appears to be a useful procedure in differentiating groups with normal daytime wake tendency from those with impaired wake tendency and in identifying individuals with pathologic inability to remain awake under soporific circumstances.

No abstract

No abstract

To understand the relationship between subjective and objective indices of sleepiness, we studied the relationship of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) in 41 consecutive patients complaining of snoring and excessive day-time sleepiness. The correlation between ESS and MWT was significant but small (rho = -0.39). There was considerable discordance between the two tests. The Lowess fit line between the ESS and the MWT indicates that the ESS falls as the MWT rises to about 4 min. It then stays at a plateau until the MWT rises to about 12 min. Thereafter, it resumes its downward slope as the MWT rises further. Thus, in patients who are severely sleepy on the MWT, the ESS may not be sensitive to different levels of sleepiness. We conclude that the ESS and the MWT are not equally useful in assessing sleepiness in patients with sleep apnea.

This study was conducted to evaluate cognitive abnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using cognitive evoked potentials (P300), and to clarify if such cognitive dysfunction is related to the OSA itself or to the hypersomnolence in OSA. Subjects were administered a polysomnogram, auditory and visual P300 testing using 31 scalp electrodes, and the multiple sleep latency test. There were 40 normal subjects ages 26 to 75. Of 143 consecutive OSA patients ages 26 to 75, 56 had severe OSA (Respiratory Disturbance Index or RDI 40-80/h sleep) with objective somnolence (Mean Sleep Latency < 5 min). Thirty-three had severe OSA without objective somnolence. Fifty-four had profound OSA (RDI > 80/h sleep) with or without objective somnolence. The normals and the three OSA groups did not differ in age. Patients with profound OSA or with severe OSA without somnolence had longer visual P300 latency than normals. The groups also differed in visual P300 latency topography. OSA patients had significantly longer latencies frontally than normals. Thus, OSA, even in the absence of hypersomnolence, is associated with abnormalities in cognitive evoked potentials. Visual P300 latency at frontal electrodes seems to be a neurophysiological index of dysfunction in OSA that is independent of tests of sleepiness.