These results suggest that environmental enrichment may serve as a protective factor for reducing amphetamine self-administration.

Obesity is an important risk factor for asthma. We recently reported increased ozone (O(3))-induced hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in obese mice (Shore SA, Rivera-Sanchez YM, Schwartzman IN, and Johnston RA. J Appl Physiol 95: 938-945, 2003). The purpose of this study was to determine whether this increased hyperresponsiveness is the result of changes in the airways, the lung tissue, or both. To that end, we examined the effect of O(3) (2 parts/million for 3 h) on methacholine-induced changes in lung mechanics with the use of a forced oscillation technique in wild-type C57BL/6J mice and mice obese because of a genetic deficiency in leptin (ob/ob mice). In ob/ob mice, O(3) increased baseline values for all parameters measured in the study: airway resistance (Raw), lung tissue resistance (Rtis), lung tissue damping (G) and elastance (H), and lung hysteresivity (eta). In contrast, no effect of O(3) on baseline mechanics was observed in wild-type mice. O(3) exposure significantly increased Raw, Rtis, lung resistance (Rl), G, H, and eta responses to methacholine in both groups of mice. For G, Rtis, and Rl there was a significant effect of obesity on the response to O(3). Our results demonstrate that both airways and lung tissue contribute to the hyperresponsiveness that occurs after O(3) exposure in wild-type mice. Our results also demonstrate that changes in the lung tissue rather than the airways account for the amplification of O(3)-induced hyperresponsiveness observed in obese mice.

Although previous studies have shown that dopamine (DA) antagonists block amphetamine reward, these studies have utilized animal models that involve repeated exposures to amphetamine. The present investigation examined the effect of DA antagonists on single-trial conditioned place preference (CPP) produced by acute intravenous (IV) amphetamine in rats. In the fi rst experiment, rats were prepared with a jugular catheter and then received an acute IV injection of amphetamine (0.1-3 mg/kg) paired with one compartment of a CPP apparatus. Relative to sham controls (no IV catheter), amphetamine produced a dose-dependent increase in locomotor activity and CPP. Two further experiments demonstrated that both effects of amphetamine were completely blocked by pretreating rats with the D 1 DA antagonist SCH-23390 (0.025 and 0.25 mg/kg) or the D 2 DA antagonist eticlopride (0.2 and 2 mg/kg) on the conditioning trial. In a fi nal experiment, single-trial amphetamine CPP did not predict subsequent self-administration of IV amphetamine (10-50 μg/infusion) using either a fi xed ratio (FR) 1 or progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement. Thus, while sharing a similar DA receptor mechanism, the present results indicate that single-trial CPP and self-administration are dissociable effects of IV amphetamine.

The present study examined the ability of a taste cue to serve as a conditioned stimulus (CS) for conditioning the analgesic effect of morphine. Rats were given three pairings of a taste CS with a morphine unconditioned stimulus (US). As expected, there was a decrease in CS intake across repeated pairings, indicating that a conditioned taste aversion was obtained. More important, presentation of the CS alone also increased paw-lick latencies on a hot plate test (either 50 degrees C or 54 degrees C hot plate), suggesting that an analgesic conditioned response (CR) was obtained. The dose of morphine required to produce conditioned analgesia was higher than the dose of morphine required to produce conditioned taste aversion. Using 15 mg/kg morphine, however, both conditioned taste aversion and conditioned analgesia were present when the morphine US was given immediately following CS intake, but not when given 6 h following CS intake. In contrast to morphine, pairing a taste CS with lithium produced a conditioned taste aversion without any conditioned analgesic response. These results indicate that acquisition of an analgesic CR is not the result of stress induced by an aversion to the taste CS.

No abstract