PURPOSE The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a global impact, and Singapore has seen 33,000 confirmed cases. Patients with cancer, their caregivers, and health care workers (HCWs) need to balance the challenges associated with COVID-19 while ensuring that cancer care is not compromised. This study aimed to evaluate the psychological effect of COVID-19 on these groups and the prevalence of burnout among HCWs. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of patients, caregivers, and HCWs at the National Cancer Centre Singapore was performed over 17 days during the lockdown. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Maslach Burnout Inventory were used to assess for anxiety and burnout, respectively. Self-reported fears related to COVID-19 were collected. RESULTS A total of 624 patients, 408 caregivers, and 421 HCWs participated in the study, with a response rate of 84%, 88%, and 92% respectively. Sixty-six percent of patients, 72.8% of caregivers, and 41.6% of HCWs reported a high level of fear from COVID-19. The top concern of patients was the wide community spread of COVID-19. Caregivers were primarily worried about patients dying alone. HCWs were most worried about the relatively mild symptoms of COVID-19. The prevalence of anxiety was 19.1%, 22.5%, and 14.0% for patients, caregivers, and HCWs, respectively. Patients who were nongraduates and married, and caregivers who were married were more anxious. The prevalence of burnout in HCWs was 43.5%, with more anxious and fearful HCWs reporting higher burnout rates. CONCLUSION Fears and anxiety related to COVID-19 are high. Burnout among HCWs is similar to rates reported prepandemic. An individualized approach to target the specific fears of each group will be crucial to maintain the well-being of these vulnerable groups and prevent burnout of HCWs.

PET/CT upstages 17% of cases and detects occult splenic involvement. This may have potential therapeutic and prognostic implications. SUV >10 may predict for an aggressive histology. Except for indolent B-NHL, our data show that PET scans have a good overall NPV in excluding lymphomatous bone marrow involvement. This is particularly true of early-stage HL, suggesting that BMB may be safely omitted in this group.

This study attempted to evaluate the usefulness of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) as a prognostic model in patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin and prednisolone) chemotherapy. We compared 279 patients with DLBCL. Among them, 183 received CHOP while 96 received R-CHOP. Results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of both the patient and the lymphoma characteristics. The estimated 2-year survival was significantly higher among patients treated with R-CHOP compared to CHOP alone (85.6% vs. 64.7%, P = 0.004). Both the IPI and age-adjusted IPI were less useful as prognostic models in patients receiving R-CHOP compared to CHOP. In the multivariate analysis, age >or= 60, elevated serum LDH, low serum albumin and advanced stages of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival in patients treated with CHOP. In contrast, among those treated with R-CHOP, only male sex and advanced stage of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival. Using these two factors, patients treated with R-CHOP could be separated into three prognostic groups with 5-year estimated survival ranging from 47% to 100% (P < 0.0001). In summary, we can conclude that with the significant improvement in survival following the use of rituximab, the relevance of previously recognized prognostic factors has to be reassessed and re-evaluated.