Background:
Given the context of ageing populations globally, there are a growing number of patients with chronic conditions, some of whom are in the final stages of their disease trajectory, presenting to Emergency Departments.
Aim:
The aim was to estimate the incidence of patients with palliative care needs presenting to the department.
Methods:
Three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase) were systematically searched up to August 2012. The reference lists of included articles were searched as well as Google and Google Scholar. Only studies in English were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies at the abstract and full-body stages. A critical review using systematic methods was undertaken as statistical analysis could not be done because of a lack of information.
Results:
Only 10 of 1427 identified records met the inclusion criteria. Different definitions of palliative care were evident. One article provided an incidence density for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, and we calculated the mean presentations to be 52.5 per 100 person-months. Two articles focussed on patients known to palliative care services; we estimated that 2.5 in 1000 Emergency Department visits were made by these patients. The review demonstrated that the studies were so different it was not possible to compare the data.
Conclusion:
There is an absence of evidence regarding the incidence of patients with palliative care needs presenting to the Emergency Department. Further research needs to be undertaken in this area to ensure both clinicians and policymakers have sufficient information for service provision.
ObjectiveWHO recommends early integration of palliative care alongside usual care to improve quality of life, although misunderstanding of palliative care may impede this. We compared the public’s perceived and actual knowledge of palliative care, and examined the relationship of this knowledge to attitudes concerning palliative care.MethodsWe analysed data from a survey of a representative sample of the Canadian public, accessed through a survey panel in May–June 2019. We compared high perceived knowledge (‘know what palliative care is and could explain it’) with actual knowledge of the WHO definition (knew ≥5/8 components, including that palliative care can be provided early in the illness and together with life-prolonging treatments), and examined their associations with attitudes to palliative care.ResultsOf 1518 adult participants residing in Canada, 45% had high perceived knowledge, of whom 46% had high actual knowledge. Participants with high (vs low) perceived knowledge were more likely to associate palliative care with end-of-life care (adjusted OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.66 to 2.79), p<0.0001) and less likely to believe it offered hope (0.62 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.81), p=0.0004). Conversely, participants with high (vs low) actual knowledge were less likely to find palliative care fearful (0.67 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.86), p=0.002) or depressing (0.72 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.93), p=0.01) and more likely to believe it offered hope (1.88 (95% CI 1.46 to 2.43), p<0.0001).ConclusionsStigma regarding palliative care may be perpetuated by those who falsely believe they understand its meaning. Public health education is needed to increase knowledge about palliative care, promote its early integration and counter false assumptions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.