Highlights A 1-hour plasma glucose (1-h PG) threshold >155 mg/dl (8.6 mmol/L) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may be a suitable biomarker for identifying normal glucose tolerant (NGT) individuals at risk for future type 2 diabetes (T2D). A one-hour, non-fasting, 50g Glucose Challenge Test (GCT) performed during a routine health care visit has potential for practical screening of glucose disorders. The shape of the glucose curve reflects the cumulative effect of insulin sensitivity and response on glucose concentrations with prospective studies warranted to evaluate its prognostic utility. The continuous glucose monitor (CGM) has facilitated insight into the pathophysiology of prediabetes and phenotypes of T2D and holds promise for detecting glycemic disorders. Metabolomic profiling including amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates and other metabolites may be useful for early diagnosis of glycemic disorders. Non-classical markers for assessing glycemic disorders including fructosamine, glycated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol that evaluate shorter periods of glucose exposure than HbA1c have potential use as adjunctive tools.

Aims To select a core list of standard outcomes for diabetes to be routinely applied internationally, including patientreported outcomes. Methods We conducted a structured systematic review of outcome measures, focusing on adults with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This process was followed by a consensus-driven modified Delphi panel, including a multidisciplinary group of academics, health professionals and people with diabetes. External feedback to validate the set of outcome measures was sought from people with diabetes and health professionals. Results The panel identified an essential set of clinical outcomes related to diabetes control, acute events, chronic complications, health service utilisation, and survival that can be measured using routine administrative data and/or clinical records. Three instruments were recommended for annual measurement of patient-reported outcome measures: the WHO Well-Being Index for psychological well-being; the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression; and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale for diabetes distress. A range of factors related to demographic, diagnostic profile, lifestyle, social support and treatment of diabetes were also identified for case-mix adjustment. Conclusions We recommend the standard set identified in this study for use in routine practice to monitor, benchmark and improve diabetes care. The inclusion of patient-reported outcomes enables people living with diabetes to report directly on their condition in a structured way.

We tested the hypothesis that hepatic nitric oxide (NO) and glutathione (GSH) are involved in the synthesis of a putative hormone referred to as hepatic insulin-sensitizing substance HISS. Insulin action was assessed in Wistar rats using the rapid insulin sensitivity test (RIST). Blockade of hepatic NO synthesis with N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, 1.0 mg/kg intraportal) decreased insulin sensitivity by 45.1 +/- 2.1% compared with control (from 287.3 +/- 18.1 to 155.3 +/- 10.1 mg glucose/kg, P < 0.05). Insulin sensitivity was restored to 321.7 +/- 44.7 mg glucose/kg after administration of an NO donor, intraportal SIN-1 (5 mg/kg), which promotes GSH nitrosation, but not after intraportal sodium nitroprusside (20 nmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)), which does not nitrosate GSH. We depleted hepatic GSH using the GSH synthesis inhibitor l-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (BSO, 2 mmol/kg body wt ip for 20 days), which reduced insulin sensitivity by 39.1%. Insulin sensitivity after l-NAME was not significantly different between BSO- and sham-treated animals. SIN-1 did not reverse the insulin resistance induced by l-NAME in the BSO-treated group. These results support our hypothesis that NO and GSH are essential for insulin action.

Diabetes has a high prevalence in Portugal. If 'pre-diabetes' is also considered, about one-third (34.9%) of the population aged 20-79 years is affected. A greater number of males were found to have diabetes. We detected a high percentage of people with undiagnosed diabetes (43.6%).

Our vision is that the participation in SWEET is encouraging members to deliver increasingly accurate and complete data. Dissemination of results and prospective projects serve as further motivation to improve data reporting. Comparing processes and outcomes will help members identify weaknesses and introduce innovative solutions, resulting in improved and more uniform care for patients with diabetes.