Key Points There is a strong negative association between comorbidities at diagnosis and overall survival. There is no negative effect of comorbidities on remission rates and progression to advanced phases in CML.

Therapy with polyclonal antibody ATG induces dose-dependent long-term changes in T-cell lymphocyte subsets, which persist over a period of years.

On the basis of a preceding phase I study, the current trial explored bendamustine in combination with mitoxantrone and rituximab (BMR) in patients with stage III/IV relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with or without prior rituximab containing chemo-immunotherapy (R-chemo) treatment. Therapy consisted of bendamustine 90 mg/m(2) days 1 + 2, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) day 1, rituximab 375 mg/m(2) day 8. Treatment was repeated on day 29 for a total of four cycles. Between 3 April and 04 July, 57 patients were recruited from 24 participating institutions, 39% of whom had received prior R-chemo therapy. Median age was 66 years (40 - 83). Lymphoma subtypes were 29 follicular (FL), 18 MCL, and 10 other indolent lymphomas. The overall response rate (ORR) was 89% with 35% CR and 54% PR. ORR in R-chemo pretreated patients was 76% (38% CR, 38% PR). After a median observation time of 27 months (1 - 43), the estimated median progression free survival is 19 months. The 2 year overall survival is 60% for patients with FL and MCL. Treatment related toxicities of grade 3/4 comprised a reversible myelosuppression (10% anemia, 78% leukocytopenia, 46% granulocytopenia, 16% thrombocytopenia). However, unexpected hospitalisations were necessary after 4% of BMR-application only. BMR is a very effective new outpatient immuno-chemotherapy with low toxicity for patients with relapsed/refractory FL, MCL and other indolent lymphomas.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease that may involve multiple organ systems. Treatment consists of immunosuppression, cytotoxic treatment, plasmapheresis and immunoglobuline therapy. Treatment of patients refractory to standard treatment approaches is difficult and results are poor. We describe a 39-year old patient with SLE suffering from grand mal epilepsy due to cerebral vasculopathy with positive lupus anticoagulant, who was refractory to standard treatment modalities. The patient was treated with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (375 mg/m2 x 4, repeated at weekly intervals). Rituximab applications were delivered in October 2000, March 2001 and October 2001. Since March 2002 she has received maintenance therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 every three months. A second female with refractory SLE was treated successfully in April 2002 and receives maintenance therapy every three months. Both patients responded well to rituximab therapy. The first patient showed a major improvement of her clinical condition, and 30 months after the beginning of the rituximab therapy she is free of any symptoms. Inflammation parameters, ANA and lupus anticoagulant declined significantly after the treatment. The clinical condition of the second patient improved dramatically, all inflammation parameters normalized and her circulating immunocomplexes disappeared. In conclusion, rituximab maintenance treatment may be a new effective therapy in SLE.

Background: Systematic evaluation of psychosocial distress in oncology outpatients is an important issue. We assessed feasibility and benefit of standardized routine screening using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) in all patients of our community-based hematooncology group practice.Patients and methods: One thousand four hundred forty-six patients were screened between July 2008 and September 2008. Five hundred randomly selected patients were sent a feedback form.Results: The average distress level was 4.7, with 37% indicating a distress level >5. Patients with nonmalignant diseases (81% autoimmune diseases or hereditary hemochromatosis) showed the highest distress level of 5.2. Most distressed were patients who just learned about relapse or metastases (6.4), patients receiving best supportive care (5.4) and patients receiving adjuvant antihormonal therapy (5.4). Ninety-seven percent of patients appreciated to speak to their doctor about their distress. Fifty-six percent felt better than usual after this consultation.Conclusion: DT and PL are feasible instruments to measure distress in hematooncology outpatients receiving routine care. DT and PL are able to improve doctor–patient communication and thus should be implemented in routine patient care. The study shows that distress is distributed differently between individuals, disease groups and treatment phases.