LIN, J.-Y., J. Arthurs and S. Reilly. Conditioned taste aversion: Palatability and drugs of abuse. NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV XX(x) XXX-XXX, 2014. – We consider conditioned taste aversion to involve a learned reduction in the palatability of a taste (and hence in amount consumed) based on the association that develops when a taste experience is followed by gastrointestinal malaise. The present article evaluates the well-established finding that drugs of abuse, at doses that are otherwise considered rewarding and self-administered, cause intake suppression. Our recent work using lick pattern analysis shows that drugs of abuse also cause a palatability downshift and, therefore, support conditioned taste aversion learning.

Taste neophobia refers to a reduction in consumption of a novel taste relative to when it is familiar. To gain more understanding of the neural basis of this phenomenon, the current study examined whether a novel taste (0.5% saccharin) supports a different pattern of c-Fos expression than the same taste when it is familiar. Results revealed that the taste of the novel saccharin solution evoked more Fos immunoreactivity than the familiar taste of saccharin in the basolateral region of the amygdala, central nucleus of the amygdala, gustatory portion of the thalamus, and the gustatory insular cortex. No such differential expression was found in the other examined areas, including the bed nucleus of stria terminalis, medial amygdala, and medial parabrachial nucleus. The present results are discussed with respect to a forebrain taste neophobia system.

Drugs of abuse are known to reduce intake of a taste conditioned stimulus (CS), a behavioral response sometimes seen as paradoxical because the same drugs also serve as rewards in other behavioral procedures. In the present study we compared patterns of intake and palatability (assessed using microstructural analysis of licking) for a standard saccharin CS paired with: lithium chloride, morphine, amphetamine, or sucrose. We found that morphine and amphetamine, like lithium-induced illness, each suppressed CS intake and caused a reduction in saccharin palatability. Sucrose, a rewarding stimulus, did not reduce the palatability of the saccharin CS. We interpret these finds as evidence that drugs of abuse induce conditioned taste aversions.

Learning what to eat and what not to eat is fundamental to our well-being, quality of life and survival. In particular, the acquisition of conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) protects all animals (including humans) against ingesting foods that contain poisons or toxins. Counterintuitively, CTAs can also develop in situations where we know with absolute certainty that the food did not cause the subsequent aversive systemic effect. Recent non-human animal research, analyzing palatability shifts, indicates that a wider range of stimuli than traditionally acknowledged can induce CTAs. This article integrates these new findings with a reappraisal of some known characteristics of CTA, and presents a novel conceptual analysis that is broader and more comprehensive than other accounts of CTA learning.

Like illness-inducing agents (e.g., lithium chloride), drugs of abuse also suppress intake of a taste solution. To explore the nature of this drug-induced intake reduction, in the current study three aqueous stimuli with different initial values served as the conditioned stimuli (CSs) that were paired with a standard dose of amphetamine in a voluntary intake procedure and lick patterns were analyzed. Consistent with earlier studies, amphetamine significantly reduced intake of all three CSs (quinine, sodium chloride and orange odor). In contrast to studies that analyze orofacial responses, we found that lick cluster size was significantly lowered by amphetamine, indicating that the psychoactive drug induced a conditioned change in CS palatability.