The emergence of cognitive poetics has focused attention on how stylistic features are processed by readers. One area ripe for empirical investigation in this respect is point of view. Little attention has previously been paid in cognitive science to the specifics of how point of view is identified during reading. This essay reports on an experiment designed to examine how readers respond to a narrative style that has attracted a great deal of interest from both stylisticians and literary critics: free indirect discourse. The experiment tested two questions in particular: (1) Do readers hear a ‘dual voice’ when reading passages of free indirect discourse? and (2) What kind of ‘contexts’ influence the identification of point of view? Some critics have noted the importance of the preceding co-text in deciding whose point of view is present in ambiguous passages; this experiment suggests that the succeeding co-text might also be relevant. This in turn has implications for the flexibility of the reading process, especially when more than one point of view may be present.
This paper presents a neural network based technique for the classification of segments of road images into cracks and normal images. The density and histogram features are extracted. The features are passed to a neural network for the classification of images into images with and without cracks. Once images are classified into cracks and non-cracks, they are passed to another neural network for the classification of a crack type after segmentation. Some experiments were conducted and promising results were obtained. The selected results and a comparative analysis are included in this paper.
SummaryWe investigated the attitudes of 96 patients and 163 anaesthetists to the need for obtaining informed consent before specialist airway techniques. Participants were asked to score six questions using a numerical scale, as to whether they thought consent was necessary before specific procedures, particularly in relation to fibreoptic intubtion used for teaching or maintaining skills. Significant differences in opinion were found between patients and anaesthetists despite a wide range of views. Overall, patients felt that specific consent was required for non-routine techniques, whilst anaesthetic respondents felt this was unnecessary, even if teaching. We conclude that guidance in obtaining consent is needed to support anaesthetists wishing to practice or teach fibreoptic intubation.
Background:The importance of exercise in the management of people with CF is well recognised, yet the effect of exercise on lung function is not well understood. FEV1 is insensitive to the detection of small changes in lung function. Ventilation MRI and LCI are both more sensitive to mild lung disease than FEV1 and may be better suited to assess the effects of exercise. Here we assessed the short-term effects of maximal exercise on the distribution of ventilation using ventilation MRI and LCI.Methods: Patients with CF and a range of lung disease were assessed. Baseline LCI and ventilation MRI was followed by a maximal cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET).Repeated ventilation MRI was performed within 30 minutes of exercise termination, followed by LCI and finally by FEV1.Results: 13 patients were recruited and completed all assessments. Mean (SD) age was 25 (10) years and mean (SD) FEV1 z-score was -1.8 (1.7). Mean LCI at baseline was 8.2, mean ventilation defect percentage on MRI (VDP) was 7.3%. All patients performed maximal CPET. Post-exercise, there was a visible change in lung ventilation in 85% of patients, including two patients with increased ventilation heterogeneity post-CPET who had normal FEV1. VDP and LCI were significantly reduced post-exercise (p<0.05) and 45% of patients had a significant change in VDP. Conclusions:Acute maximal exercise directly affects the distribution of ventilation on ventilation MRI in patients with CF. This suggests that exercise is beneficial in CF and that ventilation MRI is suitable to assess airway clearance efficacy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.