When controlling for other covariates, social isolation, physical health and mental health were significant risk factors for re-hospitalization. These findings underline the importance of assessing and addressing lack of social support, along with other factors, in the health care of older male veterans.

The authors describe the initial cohort of participants in the GET SMART program, an age-specific, outpatient program for older veterans with substance abuse problems. Chief among the program's services is a relapse-prevention intervention consisting of 16 weekly group sessions using cognitive-behavioral (CB) and self-management approaches. Group sessions begin with analysis of substance use behavior to determine high-risk situations for alcohol or drug use, followed by a series of modules to teach coping skills for coping with social pressure, being at home and alone, feelings of depression and loneliness, anxiety and tension, anger and frustration, cues for substance use, urges (self-statements), and slips or relapses. Of the first 110 admissions, more than one-third were homeless, which is indicative of the severity of psychosocial distress of the patients, and more than one-third used illicit drugs. A total of 49 patients completed CB treatment groups and 61 dropped out of treatment. At 6-month follow-up, program completers demonstrated much higher rates of abstinence compared to noncompleters. The results suggest that CB approaches work well with older veterans with significant medical, social, and drug use problems.

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the Unified Psychogeriatric Biopsychosocial Evaluation and Treatment (UPBEAT) Program, an interdisciplinary mental health care management program, on the behavioral health symptoms of elderly veterans. Participants, 60 years and older, included 2637 veterans recruited from medical/surgical units who screened positively for significant depressive or anxiety symptoms and/or at-risk alcohol drinking. Participants were randomized to UPBEAT or to usual care. Primary outcomes were measured at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Participant nonadherence to the protocol was common and is a major limitation. There were no differences between UPBEAT and usual care patients on symptom or functional outcomes at any follow-up point. Exploratory analyses suggested that among participants with more physical health problems, there were greater improvements in depressive symptoms in those assigned to UPBEAT care. Despite a theoretical and practically sound intervention, participation was low and treatment outcomes, while generally good, appeared unaffected by the addition of the program.

Results suggest that the CIRS can be used as an indicator of medical burden even with the inclusion of acute conditions. If replicated, these findings may increase CIRS use and thus aid the effort to encourage clinicians working with psychogeriatric patients to use standardized instruments to document medical burden.

UPBEAT appears to accelerate the transition from inpatient to outpatient care for acute nonpsychiatric admissions. Care coordination and increased access to ambulatory psychiatric services produces similar improvement in mental health and general health status as usual care.