Adenosine and dopamine signaling exert opposite effects in the basal ganglia, a brain region involved in sensory-motor integration. Thus, adenosine agonists induce motor depression and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, produce motor activation (1). These opposite effects result from specific antagonistic interactions between subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum, the main input structure of the basal ganglia. In fact, striatal dopamine receptors and, to some extent, adenosine receptors are segregated in the two main populations of ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) efferent neurons. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESCell Cultures-Maintenance of SH-SY5Y cells (parental and D 2 Rtransfected cells) as well as the pharmacological characterization and maintenance of D 2 R-and D 1 R-transfected mouse fibroblast Ltk Ϫ cells are described in detail elsewhere (7-9). For primary cultures, striata were removed from 16-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat embryos (B&K Universal) in Ca 2ϩ /Mg 2ϩ -free PBS supplemented with 20 units/ml penicillin and 20 g/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). The tissue fragments were pooled and mechanically dissociated in SFM Neurobasal serum-free medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), glutamine (2 mM; Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (20 units/ml/20 g/ml; Invitrogen), and ␤-mercaptoethanol (25 M) (Invitrogen). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 100 ϫ g for 5 min and resuspended in fresh medium. The resulting single-cell suspension was seeded on 24-well plates coated with gelatin (Sigma) and poly-L-lysine (Sigma), and cells were grown at 37°C in saturation humidity with 5% CO 2 .Immunolabeling Experiments-Neuroblastoma cells were grown on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) and exposed to vari-* This work was

During the 1980s, indications for the existence of intramembrane interactions between different G protein-coupled receptors, mainly between neuropeptide and monoamine receptors, were obtained in several brain areas (1, 2). It was later proposed that a possible molecular mechanism for this phenomenon was receptor heteromerization (3) and direct evidence for homo-and heteromerization of G protein-coupled receptors has been obtained by several groups. It was first shown that serotonin 5-HT-1B receptors exist as monomers and dimers (4). This was followed by demonstration of dimers and oligomers of dopamine D 1 and D 2 receptors (D 1 and D 2 R) in transfected Sf cells (5-7) and of adenosine A 1 receptors (A 1 Rs) in a natural cell line and in mammalian brain (8). It has recently been reported that a fully functional ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor demands the heterodimerization of GABA B R1 and GABA B R2 receptors (9-12). Moreover, two functional opioid receptors, the and ␦ subtypes, can undergo heteromerization, which changes the pharmacology of the individual receptors and potentiates signal transduction (13). Finally, D 2 R and somatostatin receptor subtype 5 have been shown to physically interact by forming heterooligomers with enhanced functional activity (14). Direct protein-protein coupling can also exist between G proteincoupled anion channel receptors, as recently shown for dopamine D5 receptor and GABA A receptor, making possible bilateral inhibitory interactions between these receptors (15).Antagonistic adenosine͞dopamine interactions have been widely reported in the central nervous system in behavioral and biochemical studies. Furthermore, in animal models, adenosine agonists and antagonists are potent atypical neuroleptics and antiparkinsonian drugs, respectively (16-18). Thus, adenosine agonists inhibit and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, potentiate the behavioral effects induced by dopamine agonists. The evidence suggests that this antagonism is at least in part caused by an intramembrane interaction between specific subtypes of dopamine and adenosine receptors, namely, between

Recently evidence has been presented that adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors form functional heteromeric receptor complexes as demonstrated in human neuroblastoma cells and mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells. These A2A/D2 heteromeric receptor complexes undergo coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization on D2 or A2A receptor agonist treatments and especially after combined agonist treatment. It is hypothesized that the A2A/D2 receptor heteromer represents the molecular basis for the antagonistic A2A/D2 receptor interactions demonstrated at the biochemical and behavioral levels. Functional heteromeric complexes between A2A and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGluR5) have also recently been demonstrated in HEK-293 cells and rat striatal membrane preparations. The A2A/mGluR5 receptor heteromer may account for the synergism found after combined agonist treatments demonstrated in different in vitro and in vivo models. D2, A2A, and mGluR5 receptors are found together in the dendritic spines of the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Therefore, possible D2/A2A/mGluR5 multimeric receptor complexes and the receptor interactions within them may have a major role in controlling the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal GABA neurons involved in Parkinson's disease and in schizophrenia and drug addiction, respectively.

BackgroundAlthough recent studies have identified genes expressed in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) that induce pluripotency, the molecular underpinnings of normal stem cell function remain poorly understood. The high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) gene is highly expressed in hESCs and poorly differentiated, stem-like cancers; however, its role in these settings has been unclear.Methods/Principal FindingsWe show that HMGA1 is highly expressed in fully reprogrammed iPSCs and hESCs, with intermediate levels in ECCs and low levels in fibroblasts. When hESCs are induced to differentiate, HMGA1 decreases and parallels that of other pluripotency factors. Conversely, forced expression of HMGA1 blocks differentiation of hESCs. We also discovered that HMGA1 enhances cellular reprogramming of somatic cells to iPSCs together with the Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, cMYC – OSKM). HMGA1 increases the number and size of iPSC colonies compared to OSKM controls. Surprisingly, there was normal differentiation in vitro and benign teratoma formation in vivo of the HMGA1-derived iPSCs. During the reprogramming process, HMGA1 induces the expression of pluripotency genes, including SOX2, LIN28, and cMYC, while knockdown of HMGA1 in hESCs results in the repression of these genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that HMGA1 binds to the promoters of these pluripotency genes in vivo. In addition, interfering with HMGA1 function using a short hairpin RNA or a dominant-negative construct blocks cellular reprogramming to a pluripotent state.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate for the first time that HMGA1 enhances cellular reprogramming from a somatic cell to a fully pluripotent stem cell. These findings identify a novel role for HMGA1 as a key regulator of the stem cell state by inducing transcriptional networks that drive pluripotency. Although further studies are needed, these HMGA1 pathways could be exploited in regenerative medicine or as novel therapeutic targets for poorly differentiated, stem-like cancers.