DNA methylation plays a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin organization within normal eukaryotic cells. In cancer, however, global patterns of DNA methylation are altered with global hypomethylation of repeat-rich intergenic regions and hypermethylation of a subset of CpG-dense gene-associated regions (CpG islands). Extensive research has revealed the cellular machinery that catalyzes DNA methylation, as well as several large protein complexes that mediate the transcriptional repression of hypermethylated genes. However, research is only just beginning to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying the origins of cancer-specific DNA methylation. Herein, we present several recent advances regarding these mechanisms and discuss the relationship between histone modifications (i.e., H3K4me2/3, H4K16Ac, H3K9me2/ 3, H3K27me3, H4K20me3), chromatin-modifying enzymes (G9a, EZH2, hMOF, SUV4-20H), and aberrant DNA methylation. Additionally, the role played by inflammation, DNA damage, and miRNAs in the etiology of aberrant DNA methylation is considered. Finally, we discuss the clinical implications of aberrant DNA methylation and the utility of methylated biomarkers in cancer diagnosis and management.

No abstract

Natural dietary agents have drawn a great deal of attention toward cancer prevention because of their wide safety margin. However, single agent intervention has failed to bring the expected outcome in clinical trials; therefore, combinations of chemopreventive agents are gaining increasingly popularity. In the present study, we investigated a combinatorial approach using two natural dietary polyphenols, luteolin and EGCG, and found that their combination at low doses (at which single agents induce minimal apoptosis) synergistically increased apoptosis (3-5-fold more than the additive level of apoptosis) in both head and neck and lung cancer cell lines. This combination also significantly inhibited growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice. The in vivo findings also were supported by significant inhibition of Ki-67 expression and increase in TUNEL-positive cells in xenografted tissues. Mechanistic studies revealed that the combination induced mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in some cell lines and mitochondria-independent apoptosis in others. Moreover, we found more efficient stabilization and ATM-dependent Ser 15 phosphorylation of p53 due to DNA damage by the combination, and ablation of p53 using shRNA strongly inhibited apoptosis as evidenced by decreased poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase-3 cleavage. In addition, we observed mitochondrial translocation of p53 after treatment with luteolin or the combination of EGCG and luteolin. Taken together, our results for the first time suggest that the combination of luteolin and EGCG has synergistic/additive growth inhibitory effects and provides an important rationale for future chemoprevention trials of head and neck and lung cancers.

A subset of sporadic colon cancers has been shown to have microsatellite instability caused by an epigenetic inactivation of the MLH1 gene by hypermethylation of the the CpG island in its promoter region. We report here that in colorectal cancer, inactivation of the MLH1 gene is frequently accompanied by hypermethylation of the CpG island in the promoter of the mitotic gene checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains (CHFR). This was first observed in the colon cancer cell lines HCT-116, DLD-1, RKO and HT29. Among the 61 primary colon cancer samples studied, hypermethylation of the MLH1 and the CHFR promoter was found in 31% of the tumors. In 68% of all primary cancers (13/19) with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, hypermethylation of the CHFR promoter was observed as well (P-value < 0.0001, Fisher's two-sided exact). Hypermethylation of the HLTF, MGMT, RASSF1, APC, p14 and p16 promoter regions were also frequent events, being observed in 48% (28/58), 40% (26/64), 21% (14/64), 50% (31/62), 43% (26/60) and 56% (35/63), respectively. However, methylation of these genes was not associated with methylation of either MLH1 or CHFR. The observed methylation profile was unrelated to Duke's stage. The coordinated loss of both mismatch repair caused by methylation of MLH1 and loss of checkpoint control associated with methylation of CHFR suggests the potential to overcome cell cycle checkpoints, which may lead to an accumulation of mutations.

Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (MSP) is frequently used to study gene silencing by promoter hypermethylation. However, non-specific primer design can lead to false-positive detection of methylation. We present a novel, web-based algorithm for the design of primers for bisulfite-PCRs (MSP, sequencing, COBRA and multiplex-MSP), allowing the determination of a specificity score, which is based on the thermodynamic characteristics of the primer 3 0 -end. PCR amplification with primers not reaching a high specificity score can result in false-positive findings. We used MSPprimer to design MSP primers for analysis of the ATM promoter. In 37 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples and 43 breast cancer samples no promoter methylation was detected. Conversely, published MSP primers not reaching the required specificity score led to non-specific amplification of DNA not converted by bisulfite. The result was a false-positive incidence of ATM promoter methylation of 24% in NSCLC and 48% in breast cancers, similar to published studies. This highlights the critical need for specific primer design for MSP. MSPprimer is a convenient tool to achieve this goal, which is available free of charge to the scientific community.