No abstract

The causative agent of the ongoing Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has acquired a considerable amount of mutations, leading to changes in clinical manifestations and increased transmission. Recent studies based on animal disease models and data from the general population were reporting a higher pathogenicity of the BA.2 sublineage compared to BA.1. The aim of this study was to provide real world data on patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants treated at our center, highlighting similarities and differences in the clinical disease course. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of adult patients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Department for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna, Austria. Patient characteristics including age, underlying diseases, vaccination status and outcome were compared between patients with the BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants. Between January 2022 and May 2022 we included 168 patients infected with Omicron BA.1 and 100 patients with BA.2. Patients admitted with BA.2 were significantly older, more often fully immunized and required less dexamethasone than patients with BA.1. No substantial differences were identified between patients infected with BA.1 and BA.2 regarding BMI, laboratory findings, need for supplemental oxygen, mortality and other evaluated comorbidities excepting active malignancies. The significantly larger percentage of fully immunized patients admitted with BA.2 is pointing to an increased transmissibility of this subvariant, while the comparable outcome of a somewhat older and sicker patient population might be indicative of reduced virulence.

Objectives Automated sample delivery and laboratory acceptance systems (PTAS) may influence the hemolysis rate of blood samples due to g-forces, abrupt acceleration, and rapid deceleration. However, quantitative data regarding the rate of hemolysis in PTAS is limited. To fill this void, the effect of a pneumatic tube in combination with an acceptance system (PTAS) on the hemolysis rate was investigated in this study. Methods Lithium heparin plasma tubes were transported from different clinical departments to the hospital’s laboratory (a) by employees or (b) with an automated PTAS and analyzed for the presence of hemolysis based on a hemolysis index (HI) of >25. Hemolysis indices of 68.513 samples were retrieved from the laboratory information system before and after installation of the PTAS and were subjected to statistical analysis. Results A total of 32.614 samples were transported by employees, of which 3.815 samples (11.70%) were hemolytic, and 9.441 out of 35.899 samples delivered by PTAS (26.30%) were hemolytic. After the implementation of the PTAS, hemolysis rates increased in all departments. Conclusions Automated PTAS are associated with increased hemolysis rates. This has implications for routine patient management and should be considered for the transportation of samples used for the determination of hemolysis-sensitive laboratory parameters.